2012
DOI: 10.1116/1.3698602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary electron deposition mechanism of carbon contamination

Abstract: Deposition of a carbonaceous contaminant layer on surfaces exposed to radiation exceeding 7–10 eV is ubiquitous in many fields of research. The mechanism of this deposition process is still debated. A scanning transmission x-ray microscope has been used to create and interrogate carbonaceous deposits with photon energies spanning the C 1s ionization edge. For equal fluence, the rate of carbon deposition is proportional to the x-ray absorption spectrum of the deposited material. The results are consistent with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively high carbon content is attributed to a comparably low base pressure within the gas cell resulting in deposition from residual gas and the CO ligands of the precursor molecule. The detected C K-edge NEXAFS spectra are in accordance with spectra from "dead-end"-products of long-time illuminated carbon containing material that has reached a state that cannot be further altered solely by X-ray illumination [89,99]. Due to the relatively high contamination level it was not surprising that XMCD imaging of the respective deposit did not yield any contrast indicating magnetic properties from pure Co or respective pure oxides.…”
Section: What We Have Already Learned About Fxbidsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The relatively high carbon content is attributed to a comparably low base pressure within the gas cell resulting in deposition from residual gas and the CO ligands of the precursor molecule. The detected C K-edge NEXAFS spectra are in accordance with spectra from "dead-end"-products of long-time illuminated carbon containing material that has reached a state that cannot be further altered solely by X-ray illumination [89,99]. Due to the relatively high contamination level it was not surprising that XMCD imaging of the respective deposit did not yield any contrast indicating magnetic properties from pure Co or respective pure oxides.…”
Section: What We Have Already Learned About Fxbidsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These chemical modifications are likely due to the dissociation of Cu-O, C-H [26,27], and C-O bonds and to the recombination of volatile molecules as O 2 and H 2 O that easily desorb under the action of the impinging electrons. In this reaction, a possible role of secondary electrons coming from the bulk of the sample cannot be excluded [36]. The loss of O-containing molecules reduces the oxidized components in the contaminated surface and results in a SEY decrease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is imperative to image the structures in the proper order to avoid introducing artefacts. Both SEM and STXM involve ionizing radiation which can induce mass loss, chemical changes, and deposit carbon, 17 permanently altering the sample. [4][5][6] Tapping mode AFM imaging did not noticeably alter the sample and therefore was always performed before SEM or STXM imaging.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%