2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary grammaticalization and the English adverbial -ly suffix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…What is relevant to the current study is the language-internal obligatorification. This type can be realized as 'If form x, then form y' (Killie 2015). Regarding the case of the adverbial proclitic ta-, its obligatorification means that its use is obligatory when the host sentence is compatible with this adverbial proclitic.…”
Section: Does the Secondary Grammaticalization Of Hatta Encompass Paradigmatization And Obligatorification?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is relevant to the current study is the language-internal obligatorification. This type can be realized as 'If form x, then form y' (Killie 2015). Regarding the case of the adverbial proclitic ta-, its obligatorification means that its use is obligatory when the host sentence is compatible with this adverbial proclitic.…”
Section: Does the Secondary Grammaticalization Of Hatta Encompass Paradigmatization And Obligatorification?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of change I call 'secondary grammaticalization'" (cfr. con mayor detalle Norde 2012; Breban 2014Breban , 2015Killie 2015). En este sentido, y para el caso que aquí nos interesa, los resultados de la gramaticalización secundaria vienen a coincidir con los de la amalgama: no es necesario, como puede apreciarse, que exista un cambio de significado asociado a esta coalescencia avanzada (I'd es lo mismo que I would, al menos en términos de contenido gramatical).…”
Section: Estatuto Gramatical Y Contenido Nocionalunclassified
“…Grammaticalization is more strictly focused on grammatical phenomena either general: tense and aspect (Dahl, 1985;Bybee and Dahl, 1989), modality (Traugott and Dasher, 2004;Ziegeler, 2011), spatial orientation (Heine, 1997;Sipocz, 2005) or specific: copulas (Devitt, 1994;Katz, 1996), particles of phrasal verbs (Brinton and Traugott, 2005;Los, 2006), passives (Haspelmath, 1990;Wiemer, 2015), demonstratives (Diessel, 1999;Catasso, 2011), articles (Himmelmann, 1997;Mulder and Carlier, 2011), adverbs (Heine, 1991;Haspelmath, 1997;Killie, 2014), prepositions (Seppänen, Bowen and Trotta 1994;Schwenter and Traugott, 1995;Akimoto, 1999;Hoffmann, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%