1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00774951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary ion ? Ion emission of metals and alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atomic diffusion, the features of the localization of penetrating atoms and changes in the phase composition on the surface of the treated metals and in the transition zone between the coating and the matrix were studied using a set of standard methods based on various principles [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. This provided not only the reliability of the results obtained, but also a variety of data on phase formation processes, which cannot be obtained by one particular method.…”
Section: Fig 1 Apparatus For Spark Discharge Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Atomic diffusion, the features of the localization of penetrating atoms and changes in the phase composition on the surface of the treated metals and in the transition zone between the coating and the matrix were studied using a set of standard methods based on various principles [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. This provided not only the reliability of the results obtained, but also a variety of data on phase formation processes, which cannot be obtained by one particular method.…”
Section: Fig 1 Apparatus For Spark Discharge Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the structural, concentration and chemical inhomogeneities in both the surface layers and the bulk of the metal layers, well-known methods of microautoradiographic [16][17][18][19] and electron microscopic autoradiography were used, including activation autoradiography [20][21][22][23][24]. The distribution of penetrating atoms in the coating and bulk material was estimated by the method of secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) using a microscanner [25]. Other methods used to determine the shape of the concentration profile were as follows: micro-X-ray spectral analysis [26] using the Cameca spectrometer, metallography (with x 500-2000 magnification), layered X-ray diffraction analysis with ~15 μm step (using chromium K-radiation: λ α 1 =0.22896 nm, λ α 2 =0.22935 nm and λ β 1 =0.20848 nm) with an error of the interplanar distance determination and grating periods not less than 0.00003 nm [27] and microdurometry.…”
Section: Fig 1 Apparatus For Spark Discharge Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic diffusion, the features of the localization of penetrating atoms and changes in the phase composition on the surface of the treated metals and in the transition zone between the coating and the matrix were studied using a set of standard methods based on various principles [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. This provided not only the reliability of the results obtained, but also a variety of data on phase formation processes, which cannot be obtained by one particular method.…”
Section: Fig 1 Apparatus For Spark Discharge Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the structural, concentration and chemical inhomogeneities in both the surface layers and the bulk of the metal layers, well-known methods of microautoradiographic [16][17][18][19] and electron microscopic autoradiography were used, including activation autoradiography [20][21][22][23][24]. The distribution of penetrating atoms in the coating and bulk material was estimated by the method of secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) using a microscanner [25]. Other methods used to determine the shape of the concentration profile were as follows: micro-X-ray spectral analysis [26] using the Cameca spectrometer, metallography (with x 500-2000 magnification), layered X-ray diffraction analysis with ~15 μm step (using chromium K-radiation: λ α 1 =0.22896 nm, λ α 2 =0.22935 nm and λ β 1 =0.20848 nm) with an error of the interplanar distance determination and grating periods not less than 0.00003 nm [27] and microdurometry.…”
Section: Fig 1 Apparatus For Spark Discharge Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%