2013
DOI: 10.15564/jeri.2013.11.15.2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary School Teachers' Perception on STEAM Education and Their Satisfaction on Teachers' Training Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• is consistent with accepted learning principles • may be interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary, or multidisciplinary in nature (Drake, 2007); • purposefully engages students in integrative thinking that ranges from simple to complex; • purposefully engages and assesses students in the application of gradeappropriate S, T, E, & M concepts and practices in designing, making, and evaluating solutions to authentic problems; • provides a robust context for integrative STEM-related learning associated with all levels of the cognitive and effective taxonomies (Bloom et al, 1956) 모델은 (Kang, Lee, & Kang, 2013;Son et al, 2012;Oh, 2012;, STEAM 교육의 방향 모색 및 이론적 모형 제안 (Kwon, Park, & Lee, 2011; 2012 ;Oh, 2012;Lim, 2012;Jo & Kim;Choi et al, 2012), STEAM 교육을 고려한 교육과정 개발 Lee & Cho, 2014) (Jo & Kim, 2013…”
Section: Transdisciplinarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• is consistent with accepted learning principles • may be interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary, or multidisciplinary in nature (Drake, 2007); • purposefully engages students in integrative thinking that ranges from simple to complex; • purposefully engages and assesses students in the application of gradeappropriate S, T, E, & M concepts and practices in designing, making, and evaluating solutions to authentic problems; • provides a robust context for integrative STEM-related learning associated with all levels of the cognitive and effective taxonomies (Bloom et al, 1956) 모델은 (Kang, Lee, & Kang, 2013;Son et al, 2012;Oh, 2012;, STEAM 교육의 방향 모색 및 이론적 모형 제안 (Kwon, Park, & Lee, 2011; 2012 ;Oh, 2012;Lim, 2012;Jo & Kim;Choi et al, 2012), STEAM 교육을 고려한 교육과정 개발 Lee & Cho, 2014) (Jo & Kim, 2013…”
Section: Transdisciplinarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to successfully introduce STEAM education, it is necessary to first examine teachers' perceptions of inclusive education and STEAM methods. In the case of Korea, there were several studies on the perceptions of educators at the beginning of the introduction of STEAM education (Shin & Han, 2011;Son, Jung, Kwon, Kim, & Kim, 2012;Kang, Lee, & Kang, 2013). Research from Korea has been particularly persuasive to argue that given sufficient support from the government, an effective reconstruction of the national curriculum, and significant changes in the national assessment system, STEAM education can be an effective method for improving student content learning overall (Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity [KOFAC], 2014;Park, Byun, Sim, Han, & Baek, 2016;Kang, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers in South Korea have recognized steam education as convergence education only on a simple level (Kang, Lee, Kang, 2013). Art is liberal arts, but it tends to focus more on simply superficially music, fine arts, and literature itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%