2021
DOI: 10.46827/ejes.v8i9.3915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary School Teachers’ Perceptions of the Challenges and Solutions to Online Assessment of Learning

Abstract: <p>The study determined secondary school teachers’ perceptions of the challenges and solutions to online assessment of learning. The study is a descriptive survey guided by two research questions and two null hypotheses tested at 0.05 level of significance. The instruments for data collection were Digital Literacy Test (DLT) and a structured questionnaire titled: Challenges and Solutions to Online Assessment of Learning (CASOAL). The reliability of DLT was determined using Kuder-Richardson formula 20 to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, applying online proctoring or other high‐technological solutions to prevent cheating may not always be feasible in the K–12 school environment compared to high‐stakes testing (e.g., college admission tests, licensure exams) due to various reasons (e.g., insufficient bandwidth, lack of appropriate infrastructure; Chinyere, 2021). To reduce the risk of cheating in nonproctored online assessments, item formats other than multiple‐choice, as well as items for which a quick online search may not provide an immediate solution should be adopted (Cluskey et al., 2011; Holden et al., 2020).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, applying online proctoring or other high‐technological solutions to prevent cheating may not always be feasible in the K–12 school environment compared to high‐stakes testing (e.g., college admission tests, licensure exams) due to various reasons (e.g., insufficient bandwidth, lack of appropriate infrastructure; Chinyere, 2021). To reduce the risk of cheating in nonproctored online assessments, item formats other than multiple‐choice, as well as items for which a quick online search may not provide an immediate solution should be adopted (Cluskey et al., 2011; Holden et al., 2020).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For students, online assessment provides more control and friendly atmosphere for students (Ridgway, McCusker & Pad, 2004). The immediate feedback provided by teachers help improving learning in general and preparing for exams in particular (Joshi et al, 2020;Chinyere, 2021). Furthermore, online assessment helps increasing students' motivation since it provides flexibility for students to have their examination (Ridgway, McCusker & Pad, 2004;Weleschuk, Dyjur & Kelly, 2019).…”
Section: Advantages Of Online Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of assessing the speaking skill, technical issues, the difficulty of addressing students' higher order thinking skills, students' anxiety, both teachers' and students' negative perceptions of online assessment and students' lack of commitment and motivation (Kearns, 2012;Alruwais, Wills & Wald, 2018;Chinyere, 2021;Abduh, 2021;Mirza, 2021).…”
Section: Challenges Of Online Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations