2020
DOI: 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.05.5429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary small cell vaginal cancer after operative therapy for endometrial cancer

Abstract: Background: Gynecologic neuroendocrine carcinoma is rare. There is no case report of secondary small cell vaginal cancer after operative therapy for endometrial cancer. Case: A 51 year-old patient was treated by operative therapy for endometrial cancer stage IA (pT1aN0M0). After 9 months' post-treatment, the patient visited the hospital with abnormal bleeding, and a necrotic lesion in the left upper third of the posterior vaginal wall was detected near the vaginal cut edge. Biopsy of this tumor revealed neuroe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in case of recurrent metastasis, the endometrial endometrioid carcinoma occasionally presents as a dedifferentiated cancer [ 5 ] or HGNEC [ 3 , 4 ] components at the site of metastasis/recurrence. Actually, Shimazaki I et al [ 6 ] reported that secondary small cell carcinoma in vaginal stump after hysterectomy for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Therefore, metastasis/recurrence of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma cannot be ruled out based upon only morphological differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in case of recurrent metastasis, the endometrial endometrioid carcinoma occasionally presents as a dedifferentiated cancer [ 5 ] or HGNEC [ 3 , 4 ] components at the site of metastasis/recurrence. Actually, Shimazaki I et al [ 6 ] reported that secondary small cell carcinoma in vaginal stump after hysterectomy for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Therefore, metastasis/recurrence of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma cannot be ruled out based upon only morphological differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%