2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87097-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary structural choice of DNA and RNA associated with CGG/CCG trinucleotide repeat expansion rationalizes the RNA misprocessing in FXTAS

Abstract: CGG tandem repeat expansion in the 5′-untranslated region of the fragile X mental retardation-1 (FMR1) gene leads to unusual nucleic acid conformations, hence causing genetic instabilities. We show that the number of G…G (in CGG repeat) or C…C (in CCG repeat) mismatches (other than A…T, T…A, C…G and G…C canonical base pairs) dictates the secondary structural choice of the sense and antisense strands of the FMR1 gene and their corresponding transcripts in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This G4-forming property of DG was lost when it was paired with its reverse complementary oligonucleotide in a Watson-Crick pairing (labeled WC in Fig S11). The hypochromic thermal melting curve (at 260 nm) observed for DG was independent of the KCl concentration, indicating the formation of G4s 49,50 (Fig S11B). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays further indicated that the hybrid G4 conformations preferred by DG were intramolecular (Lanes 2-6 in Fig S11C) as it moved faster than the d(T) 27 oligonucleotide (Lane 1 in Fig S11C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This G4-forming property of DG was lost when it was paired with its reverse complementary oligonucleotide in a Watson-Crick pairing (labeled WC in Fig S11). The hypochromic thermal melting curve (at 260 nm) observed for DG was independent of the KCl concentration, indicating the formation of G4s 49,50 (Fig S11B). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays further indicated that the hybrid G4 conformations preferred by DG were intramolecular (Lanes 2-6 in Fig S11C) as it moved faster than the d(T) 27 oligonucleotide (Lane 1 in Fig S11C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These signature peaks were absent in a control WC sequence (Fig S4B), indicating that the hybrid quadruplex formation was specific to Scheme-DG and not observed in the Scheme-WC. The hypochromic thermal melting curve observed for the Scheme-DG was independent of the KCl concentration indicating higher-order G4s formations 45,46 (Fig S4B). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays further indicated that the hybrid G4s conformations preferred by the Scheme-DG were intramolecular (Lanes 2-6 in Fig S4C) as it moved faster than the d(T) 27 (Lane 1 in Fig S4C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solvents were dried by standard methods and distilled before use. The 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Ultra shield 400 and Bruker AscEnd 600 spectrometers at 25 °C. Chemical shifts, given relative to TMS, were referenced to the solvent resonances as internal standards.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is conflicting evidence regarding the secondary structural preference of DNA and RNA strands. CGG stem-loop/hairpins are relatively stable and easily formed in vitro and in vivo using Watson-Crick G:C and Hoogsteen G:G base pairs ( Figure 2A ) ( Chen et al, 1995 ; Mitas et al, 1995 ; Nadel et al, 1995 ; Usdin and Woodford, 1995 ; Yu et al, 1997 ; Handa et al, 2003 ; Sobczak et al, 2003 ; Zumwalt et al, 2007 ; Ciesiolka et al, 2017 ; Ajjugal et al, 2021 ; Poggi and Richard, 2021 ). However, in the presence of physiological K+ concentrations, stable G-quadruplex (G4) and intercalated-motif (i-motif) structures are formed from CGG and CCG repeat strands, respectively ( Figure 2B ) ( Kettani et al, 1995 ; Fojtík and Vorlícková, 2001 ; Weisman-Shomer et al, 2002 ; Weisman-Shomer et al, 2003 ; Khateb et al, 2007 ; Renčiuk et al, 2011 ; Krzyzosiak et al, 2012 ; Loomis et al, 2014 ; Malgowska et al, 2014 ; Yang and Rodgers, 2014 ; Chen et al, 2018 ; Asamitsu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%