2004
DOI: 10.1177/088572880402700204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Students' Involvement in Their IEP Meetings: Administrators' Perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Grigal and colleagues noted that IEP meeting participation may have different meanings to different people and that some people may equate simply attending the meeting with participation. Other studies have confirmed this "attendance equals participation" notion (Field & Hoffman, 1994;Martin, Greene, & Borland, 2004). Teachers involved in the Martin et al (in press) study made the following comments after teaching the self-directed IEP to their students:…”
Section: A Different Waymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, Grigal and colleagues noted that IEP meeting participation may have different meanings to different people and that some people may equate simply attending the meeting with participation. Other studies have confirmed this "attendance equals participation" notion (Field & Hoffman, 1994;Martin, Greene, & Borland, 2004). Teachers involved in the Martin et al (in press) study made the following comments after teaching the self-directed IEP to their students:…”
Section: A Different Waymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Active student involvement at the IEP meeting is central to this process (Martin, Greene, & Borland, 2004). It is now up to professionals and parents to invite students into the IEP planning process and to support them while they…”
Section: A Different Waymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of qualitative designs to informing evidence-based policy and practice in special education has been highlighted elsewhere (Brantlinger et al, 2005) and is certainly reflected within the pages of CDTEI. For example, researchers have probed the perceptions of key stakeholders on transition practices and outcomes (Lehmann & Baker, 1994), explored the experiences of students with intellectual disability transitioning from school (Paiewonsky, 2011), and investigated practitioners’ understanding of constructs like self-determination and student involvement (Martin, Greene, & Borland, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent data suggest that students are increasingly likely to attend their individualized education program (IEP) meetings (National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 [NLTS2], 2003); however, their attendance at meetings does not ensure active participation (Martin, Greene, & Borland, 2004;Mason, Field, & Sawilowsky, 2004;NLTS2;Powers, Turner, Matuszewski, Wilson, & Phillips, 2001). It is likely that students are passive attendees because they are not sure what to expect when they attend their meetings and because they have not received instruction in how to participate in such a meeting (Johnson & Sharpe, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%