2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary task engagement and disengagement in the context of highly automated driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…References [4,11,13,16,18] report a degree of certainty (uncertainty information) with which the automation can cope with the current scenario as relevant. Additionally, it has been reported that the remaining automated travel distance/time is important [11,[19][20][21]. These information requirements have already been incorporated into the HMI design for partially and conditionally automated driving in numerous studies (e.g., [12,14,[22][23][24]).…”
Section: Information Needs In Automated Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…References [4,11,13,16,18] report a degree of certainty (uncertainty information) with which the automation can cope with the current scenario as relevant. Additionally, it has been reported that the remaining automated travel distance/time is important [11,[19][20][21]. These information requirements have already been incorporated into the HMI design for partially and conditionally automated driving in numerous studies (e.g., [12,14,[22][23][24]).…”
Section: Information Needs In Automated Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, participants wanted to have an overview of this intersection. In the context of the navigation data, a display of the remaining automated travel time/distance was mentioned only three times, and, in contrast to the literature [11,[19][20][21], had only a subordinate role. On the one hand, this may be due to the fact that there were no interruptions due to requests to intervene, and, on the other hand, no free NDRAs were offered which might have required better planning via the remaining time.…”
Section: Need For Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closely linked to interruptions is the process of activity planning. According to the three-level model of planning by Schömig and Metz [36] and Wandtner et al [15], appropriate self-regulatory behavior includes limiting task engagements to sections of automated driving (planning level), considering estimated task duration and predicted system availability (decision level), and maintenance of take-over readiness (control level). Planning one's activity engagement in automated driving can be supported by predictive HMI elements that display current and upcoming periods of automated driving, thus theoretically allowing the user to adapt NDRA engagement and in turn reduce workload and discomfort due to interruption events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies actually investigating design and effects of predictive HMI elements were conducted by Richardson et al [14], Wandtner et al [15], and Holländer et al [12]. All three studies found positive effects; Richardson et al [14] discovered time-and distance-based predictive HMIs for conditionally automated trucks to lower workload, and increase acceptance and usability compared to a baseline HMI with no predictive elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation