2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondhand Smoke and Smokefree Policies in Owner-Occupied Multi-Unit Housing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have asked residents about SHS 'drifting' into the apartment, 10 while some have asked how often or whether they have smelled, breathed or noticed odours of tobacco smoke coming from other sources, 11 13 15 17 22 and others have asked about cigarette or tobacco smoke entering or coming into their unit or living space from other sources. 14 20 21 Additionally, one study asked residents who reported smelling tobacco smoke in their building whether they ever smell tobacco smoke inside their unit. 23 Studies have also been variable in assessments of the frequency of exposure and in defining exposure timeframes (eg, past 6 or 12 months).…”
Section: Shs Incursionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some have asked residents about SHS 'drifting' into the apartment, 10 while some have asked how often or whether they have smelled, breathed or noticed odours of tobacco smoke coming from other sources, 11 13 15 17 22 and others have asked about cigarette or tobacco smoke entering or coming into their unit or living space from other sources. 14 20 21 Additionally, one study asked residents who reported smelling tobacco smoke in their building whether they ever smell tobacco smoke inside their unit. 23 Studies have also been variable in assessments of the frequency of exposure and in defining exposure timeframes (eg, past 6 or 12 months).…”
Section: Shs Incursionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study with less than a majority expressing preference for a smoke-free building (37%), the question was worded as a complete indoor and outdoor smoking ban; 10 in the other study where less than a majority (42%) expressed preference for a building policy, 32% of residents indicated that they had no preference. 14 Residents' support for smoke-free MUH was assessed by many demographic and behavioural characteristics. Support for smoke-free buildings was stronger among non-smokers than smokers, though some smokers were supportive of such policies (table 2).…”
Section: Shs Incursionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 This may be particularly true for residents of multiunit housing, where SHS can infiltrate smokefree living units from units that permit smoking and shared areas. [3][4][5][6] In addition to SHS-related healthcare costs, smoking in multiunit housing can lead to excess expenses from property renovation and smoking-attributable fires. 7,8 Approximately 7.1 million Americans lived in subsidized housing during 2009-2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most properties (81.2%; 95% CI, 78.8%-83.5%) allowed smoking in all residential units (individual apartments), while 16 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%