1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90345-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sectional prostheses connected by samarium-cobalt magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This led to considerable loss of weight of acrylic framework and also there is no need to fabricate the whole prosthesis again in case of discoloration or damage of the silicone layer as the outer silicone layer can be removed and repacked with the new silicon on the acrylic resin framework if the mold is preserved The resin framework obtained was trimmed, finished, and was then adjusted clinically with the aid of pressure indicating paste to allow complete seating on the face. Facial moulage was then made again to pick up the resin framework in alginate impression material (so as to allow maximum adaptation of prosthesis to tissues for retention and to restore facial features in correct alignment during sculpting in wax and later on in final silicone prosthesis) and was poured to obtain a new working model [Figure 3a and b ] The three Cobalt-Samarium magnets, 2.5 mm in thickness (Jobmasters, Randallstown, MD, USA)[ 6 ] were embedded in acrylic framework [ Figure 4 ]. The counter magnets and modified stock eye prosthesis were then securely positioned with wax on resin framework.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This led to considerable loss of weight of acrylic framework and also there is no need to fabricate the whole prosthesis again in case of discoloration or damage of the silicone layer as the outer silicone layer can be removed and repacked with the new silicon on the acrylic resin framework if the mold is preserved The resin framework obtained was trimmed, finished, and was then adjusted clinically with the aid of pressure indicating paste to allow complete seating on the face. Facial moulage was then made again to pick up the resin framework in alginate impression material (so as to allow maximum adaptation of prosthesis to tissues for retention and to restore facial features in correct alignment during sculpting in wax and later on in final silicone prosthesis) and was poured to obtain a new working model [Figure 3a and b ] The three Cobalt-Samarium magnets, 2.5 mm in thickness (Jobmasters, Randallstown, MD, USA)[ 6 ] were embedded in acrylic framework [ Figure 4 ]. The counter magnets and modified stock eye prosthesis were then securely positioned with wax on resin framework.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three Cobalt-Samarium magnets, 2.5 mm in thickness (Jobmasters, Randallstown, MD, USA)[ 6 ] were embedded in acrylic framework [ Figure 4 ]. The counter magnets and modified stock eye prosthesis were then securely positioned with wax on resin framework.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] The use of magnets is one of the most efficient means of providing sectional prosthesis with adequate retention and stability in patients with deformities requiring complex rehabilitations. [8,9] Magnets are attached to each section, when the sections are assembled properly; the magnets are attracted to each other and retain the sections. [9] The aim of this article is to describe the prosthetic treatment for a head and neck cancer patient with a segmental mandibular and facial defect and the contribution of this prosthesis in improving the patients QOL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In edentulous patients with maxillectomy defects, effective retention, support and stability of an obturator prosthesis must be obtained from residual palatal structures and by engaging suitable undercuts within the defect. A sectional magnetically retained, hollow obturator prosthesis is beneficial to patients to permit easy insertion and removal and to minimize weight ( Sasaki et al ., 1984 ; Mitchell, Gary & Khan, 1989; Devlin & Barker, 1992). The obturator portion is made of resilient silicone material that appropriately engages undercuts within the defects which can not be utilized by a rigid obturator, thus providing retention, support and stability of the prosthesis ( Beumer, Curtis & Firtell, 1979; Finlay, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%