2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11160-019-09571-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sectioned or whole otoliths? A global review of hard structure preparation techniques used in ageing sparid fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coefficient of variation (CV, %) in the top left of each panel Table 4 Percent frequency of confidence scores assigned by two age-readers (Reader 1 and 2) to age estimates obtained from whole and transversely thin-sectioned otoliths, and thinsectioned otoliths and pelvic fin rays (Reader 1 only) using lake trout from Great Bear Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada *Total n = does not equal to Table 1 Our conclusion that age of older lake trout cannot be estimated accurately from whole otoliths agrees with Campana et al (2008), who discussed how earlier studies likely underestimated lake trout ages using this method. Similar conclusions regarding whole versus sectioned otolith methods have been made for other long-lived species (Beamish 1979;Winkler et al 2019). Experienced readers in our study (Readers 1 and 2) clearly interpreted annuli differently toward the margin of whole otoliths for lake trout ≥ 35 years (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Coefficient of variation (CV, %) in the top left of each panel Table 4 Percent frequency of confidence scores assigned by two age-readers (Reader 1 and 2) to age estimates obtained from whole and transversely thin-sectioned otoliths, and thinsectioned otoliths and pelvic fin rays (Reader 1 only) using lake trout from Great Bear Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada *Total n = does not equal to Table 1 Our conclusion that age of older lake trout cannot be estimated accurately from whole otoliths agrees with Campana et al (2008), who discussed how earlier studies likely underestimated lake trout ages using this method. Similar conclusions regarding whole versus sectioned otolith methods have been made for other long-lived species (Beamish 1979;Winkler et al 2019). Experienced readers in our study (Readers 1 and 2) clearly interpreted annuli differently toward the margin of whole otoliths for lake trout ≥ 35 years (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…There are total of 31 sparid species in the Mediterranean Sea, which are known to be slow-growing and long-lived (Hanel and Tsigenopoulos, 2011) and susceptible to over-exploitation due to their commercial importance (Comeros-Raynal et al, 2016). Sparid fishes generally have relatively large and easily readable sagittal otoliths, and despite the wealth of literature denouncing the use of whole, unsectioned otoliths in growth studies on sparid fishes (see Winkler et al, 2019), age determination using whole otoliths is still common. According to the information available in Fish Base, the maximum age reported for sparids in the Mediterranean ranges from 5 to 36 years ( Table 2).…”
Section: Opportunities For Fish Growth Chronology Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species from the families Sparidae and Lutjanidae have annual growth rings, that although thin, are clearly visible (Piddocke et al, 2015;Winkler et al, 2019), and represent the most promising target taxa for sclerochronology studies. Interesting target species of Sparidae include Dentex dentex, Diplodus cervinus, and Sparus aurata.…”
Section: Opportunities For Otolith Chemistry Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The periodicity of these concentric rings may be related to daily, seasonal or annual cycles and are thought to occur as a result of changes in many factors, including photoperiod, temperature, seasonal feeding and growth rates (Radtke and Shafer 1992;Secor et al 1995;Chang and Geffen 2013). In many species, an otolith is age estimated by blocking it in resin, cutting a thin section (,250-500 mm), and then the section is mounted on a microscope slide for viewing under a microscope (Secor et al 1992;Winkler et al 2019). Although this approach is currently the most accepted method, it requires practice and experience to obtain accurate age estimates, is labour intensive, time consuming and expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%