2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3787-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sectioning the anterolateral ligament did not increase tibiofemoral translation or rotation in an ACL-deficient cadaveric model

Abstract: Adding an ALL lesion in an ACL-deficient knee did not increase tibiofemoral instability in this cadaveric model. It remains unclear whether injury to the ALL would result in substantial knee instability in the setting of ACL injury in vivo. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the role of the ALL during knee kinematics and to determine in which scenarios ALL repair would be warranted. Understanding the function of the ALL may improve the current treatment strategies for ACL ruptures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
2
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
63
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These papers showed clearly that cutting the ALL led to significant increases in tibial internal rotation laxity, which means that the ALL must act to resist tibial internal rotation. In contrast to these studies, it has also been reported that adding an ALL lesion to an ACL-deficient knee did not lead to measureable increases in either anterior translation or internal rotation during clinical testing of whole cadavers [50]. …”
Section: Anterior–posterior and Internal–external Rotation Laxity Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These papers showed clearly that cutting the ALL led to significant increases in tibial internal rotation laxity, which means that the ALL must act to resist tibial internal rotation. In contrast to these studies, it has also been reported that adding an ALL lesion to an ACL-deficient knee did not lead to measureable increases in either anterior translation or internal rotation during clinical testing of whole cadavers [50]. …”
Section: Anterior–posterior and Internal–external Rotation Laxity Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some study groups found this ligament to be an important restraint of internal tibial rotation, 1,26,27,30 others described the biomechanical role of the ALL to be negligible. 20,32,43 Considering the inconsistent terms and conflicting findings, it is crucial that the anterolateral knee structure is clearly defined and a consistent terminology is developed. A thorough appreciation of the anatomic characteristics will clarify the role of the lateral extra-articular structures as well as the indications for lateral-side extra-articular procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parsons et al 28 demonstrated that the ALL was an important stabiliser of internal rotation at flexion angles great than 35°. In contrast, Saiegh et al 29 found that isolated sectioning of the ALL in an ACL deficient knee did not increase tibiofemoral instability in their cadaver model. Kittl et al 30 found that the ALL and anterolateral capsule played only minor roles in restraining internal rotation.…”
Section: Biomechanicsmentioning
confidence: 81%