2018
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secular changes in the symptom level of clinically diagnosed autism

Abstract: Over time, considerably fewer autism symptoms seemed to be required for a clinical diagnosis of autism, at least for those diagnosed after the preschool years. The findings add support for the notion that the observed increase in autism diagnoses is, at least partly, the by-product of changes in clinical practice, and flag up the need for working in agreement with best practice guidelines.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
54
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increases in the frequencies of some criteria in this dataset contrasts with results from a study in Sweden which found fewer autism symptoms among children diagnosed in 2014 than among children diagnosed in 2004 [38]. Arvidsson et al suggest that clinical diagnoses of autism are being made in the year 2014 for cases that are less severe and would not have been given that diagnosis in 2004.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The increases in the frequencies of some criteria in this dataset contrasts with results from a study in Sweden which found fewer autism symptoms among children diagnosed in 2014 than among children diagnosed in 2004 [38]. Arvidsson et al suggest that clinical diagnoses of autism are being made in the year 2014 for cases that are less severe and would not have been given that diagnosis in 2004.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…For example, Gillberg and colleagues reported no increase in levels of (parent‐reported) autistic traits (at 9 or 12 years) in a Swedish population‐based sample of children born from 1993 to 2003, but a significant increase in the rates of autism diagnosis over this 10‐year period (Lundström et al, ). They also found a decrease in level of parent‐reported autism (and related) symptoms and impairment for children receiving an autism diagnosis at age 7–13 years, over the period 2004–2014 (Arvidsson et al, ). The authors suggest the bar for diagnosis is now significantly lower – perhaps too low.…”
Section: The Changing Concept Of Autism: 2 From Rare To Commonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There has been an increase in the prevalence of autism from less than 0.05% in 1966 3 to 1.47% among children aged 8 years in the United States 4 and to more than 2% in studies 5 measuring lifetime prevalence through less stringent case ascertainment. In the absence of a reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of autism, this statistic may reflect multiple factors, such as a true increase in autism in the population, greater public awareness of autism, 6 diagnostic substitution, 7 a link between diagnosis and support, greater tendency to diagnose individuals with an IQ in the normal range, 8 a diminished threshold for clinical diagnosis, 9 the use of checklist diagnoses, 10 or low specificity of standardized diagnostic instruments in clinical settings. 11 , 12 Possible changes in diagnostic practices may have resulted in empirical studies assessing an increasingly heterogeneous population, including individuals with less profound deviations from normal that would not have previously been classified as autistic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%