2006
DOI: 10.1086/509746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secularism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is becoming more difficult for scholars to view secularism simply as the opposite of religion, or the absence of religion, it remains difficult to adequately state what secularism is. On the one hand, it is now commonly argued that secularism is equivalent to the culture of protestant Christianity, and to the individualistic culture of modern, pluralistic democracy (Berger 2007), and along the same lines, but turned somewhat more critically and provocatively, it has been suggested secularism is simply equivalent to western Christianity, which is simply equivalent to western Imperialism (Anidjar 2006). On the other hand, it has been argued that secularism as such does not exist, that there is no general, global phenomenon that corresponds to "the secular," and that scholars can only meaningfully investigate the interrelation of distinct religious traditions, with particular regimes of governance, on individual occasions or around certain issues (Bowen 2010).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is becoming more difficult for scholars to view secularism simply as the opposite of religion, or the absence of religion, it remains difficult to adequately state what secularism is. On the one hand, it is now commonly argued that secularism is equivalent to the culture of protestant Christianity, and to the individualistic culture of modern, pluralistic democracy (Berger 2007), and along the same lines, but turned somewhat more critically and provocatively, it has been suggested secularism is simply equivalent to western Christianity, which is simply equivalent to western Imperialism (Anidjar 2006). On the other hand, it has been argued that secularism as such does not exist, that there is no general, global phenomenon that corresponds to "the secular," and that scholars can only meaningfully investigate the interrelation of distinct religious traditions, with particular regimes of governance, on individual occasions or around certain issues (Bowen 2010).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 I am drawing these thoughts and words from Jean-Luc Nancy (2008). 7 Anidjar, 2006, p. 61. 8 Nancy, 2008.…”
Section: About the Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. A broadly representative but not exhaustive list of this literature would include a multitude of writers spanning a range of disciplines, including anthropology, economics, history, literary criticism, philosophy and political science (Anidjar 2006;Bhargava 1998;Bhargava 2000;Bharucha 1998;Bilgrami 1999;Chatterjee 1995;Ganguly 2003;Haqqi 1993;Hasan 2004;Hasan 2007;Jhingran 1995;Madan 1987;Nandy 2001a, 2001b, 2003a, 2003b, Robinson 2000Sen 2005;Srinivasan 2007;Sunder Rajan and Needham 2007). 5.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%