Secularity and Urban Gentrification: An Spatial Analysis of Downtown Buddhist Temples in Shanghai

Abstract

This essay examines the relationship between the processes of urban change and the politically and commercially constructed nature of Buddhism since 1978 in Shanghai. After examining data from 120 temples together with ethnographic research in two downtown temples, the author finds two key changes in urban Buddhism: First, political constructions cause an increasing divide between the city center and suburban areas in the religious spaces of Buddhism. The mainstreaming of Buddhism in the downtown areas has emerged with the new trend of economic and cultural gentrification that has generated different physical and social neighborhoods. Second, not confined to being iconized as tourist sites, Buddhist temples led by powerful abbots are engaged in “niche-switching” between attracting commuters and visitors and attending to temple-based devotees. With new spatial strategies, such as the development of cultural philanthropy and interprovincial pilgrimages, temple-based clergy have to negotiate their social positions in the commercial zones. The results indicate how the neighborhood has become less important once temples extend their members’ nongeographic ties.

Reproduction, cultural symbolism, and online relationship: Constructing city spatial imagery on TikTok

“…In the field of city spatial imagery research, the hotspots are clustered in four areas: (1) the characteristics of urban spatial imagery as determined by a dynamic and comparative data analysis ( Huang, 2002 ; Kitchin and Blades, 2002 ). (2) The effects of city spatial imagery, which is thought to influence residents’ attitudes and behaviors ( Hayllar and Griffin, 2005 ), such as influencing residents’ evaluation of their activity experience ( Smith and McGillivray, 2022 ), evaluation of the urban environment ( Abass et al, 2019 ), behavioral choices ( Prayag et al, 2017 ), attitudes towards urban resource management measures ( Ramkissoon and Nunkoo, 2011 ; Hammitt et al, 2015 ), and urban image formation and communication ( Bavinton, 2013 ; Hernández-Mogollón et al, 2018 ).…”