Secure and Efficient Group Key Agreements for Cluster Based Networks

Dutta, Ratna; Dowling, Tom

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01004-0_6

Cited by 15 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the conventional GKA definition, a group of members interact to establish a common secret key within an open network. Since the publication of two-party Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange in 1976 [12], various solutions have been proposed to extend Diffie-Hellman key exchange to a multiparty key agreement [11,6,9,13,14,17,24,27,7,15,25,19,8,4,3,20,28,[21][22][23]16]. Most notable and best known among those proposals are the ITW protocols [19], BD protocols [8], d-cube protocols [4,3,20], CLIQUES [28], and tree-based protocols [21][22][23]16].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group key agreement for secure group communication in dynamic peer systems

Wang

2012

Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group key agreement for secure group communication in dynamic peer systems

Wang

2012

Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Key Setup Phase: Secure group key is constructed among the dynamically constructed group key using group key protocol [12]. 2.…”

Section: Procedures For Secure Code Updatementioning

confidence: 99%

Framework for Secure Code Updates for Wireless Sensor Nodes

Nirmala¹,

Manjunath²

2015

2015 12th International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In wireless sensor networks securing code update is essential for many crucial military applications. The nodes deployed in border areas in the military region called the border sensor nodes are the more sensitive nodes. The border sensor nodes need to do some special tasks compared to other intermediated sensor nodes. So the code update to be sent to the border nodes will be different from the other intermediate nodes. Thus, the code updates that need to be sent to the border sensor nodes should be highly confidential. The confidentiality of these code updates cannot be compromised at any cost, hence Key management is also an important issue. A protocol is developed to securely send the code update to the border sensor nodes via intermediate nodes. The Protocol is implemented using necs on TinyOS platform and evaluated the performance.

show abstract

“…CBKAP proto-cols are more efficient than pairwise key establishment schemes for WSNs because devices do not waste energy every time they wish to communicate with another de-vice by establishing a new shared secret key. The majority of cluster-based key agreement schemes [1], [2], [3], assume a specific hierarchical structure of the clusters or some tree-structure and then apply a general key agreement protocol. The CBKAP protocol is first applied locally in every cluster and then, the clusters' keys are used from the same or another key agreement mechanism to form the final group key [16].…”

Section: Cluster Based Key Agreement Protocols (Cbkap)mentioning

confidence: 99%