2005
DOI: 10.1080/0141987042000337867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secure borders and safe haven and the gendered politics of belonging: Beyond social cohesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
182
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
182
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Ethnicity is more than a question of ethnic identity; it involves partaking of the social conditions of a group…and always involves a political dimension (Anthias and Yuval-Davis, 1992). 13 Whether this reflects processes of generation, age, experience or length of residence in Bangladesh is unclear, however we can assume that the life stage reached is likely to have contributed, alongside socio-historical circumstances and personal history (Gardner, 1998). 14 The myth of common origin, and a homogenous national culture/religion as encapsulating totality, is central to such constructions (Yuval-Davis et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 Ethnicity is more than a question of ethnic identity; it involves partaking of the social conditions of a group…and always involves a political dimension (Anthias and Yuval-Davis, 1992). 13 Whether this reflects processes of generation, age, experience or length of residence in Bangladesh is unclear, however we can assume that the life stage reached is likely to have contributed, alongside socio-historical circumstances and personal history (Gardner, 1998). 14 The myth of common origin, and a homogenous national culture/religion as encapsulating totality, is central to such constructions (Yuval-Davis et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this dichotomy, between nation and 'cultural collectivity' conceals the link between ethnicity and nationalism that works to represent the culture and history of the dominant ethnic group as that of the nation state (May, 2001). Constructed in this way national identity implicitely inscribes traditions of 'us' and 'them', 'nation' and 'foreigner' that attempt to arrest the proliferation of difference that cultural plurality produces (Lewis and Neal, 2005;Yuval-Davis et al, 2005). 14 In pre-2008 Bangladesh, the cultural collectivity of the other ('Bihari') sat squarely outside the nation-state.…”
Section: Ethnic Identification At the Intersections Of 'Community'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional 'unitary' model of citizenship assumes that the political and cultural spheres of membership are aligned so that every citizen is also part of the nation. As such, the individual's membership in a political community is dissolved into a collective 'cultural' identity, which for some still limits real access (Yuval-Davis et al, 2005). It has been commonly assumed that it is this collective cultural identity which limits the access of 'Urdu-speakers' to the nation-state in Bangladesh.…”
Section: A 'Nationalizing State': Spaces Of In/exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, efforts to maintain stable Muslim communities came to be identified as one of the major barriers to "community cohesion", which in turn was singled out as a major contributing factor to a series of riots in Oldham, Burnley and Bradford in the North of England in 2001 [24]. This led to renewed emphasis in UK social policy on the need to foster mixing between religious groups and identification with the British nation (as well as, critics have persuasively argued, less emphasis being placed upon economic deprivation and prejudice against minorities [25]). …”
Section: A Crisis In Transmission?mentioning
confidence: 99%