“…The categories are depicted in Table 2 followed by references to articles in the category. [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28] Architecture (portability, interoperability and integration of teaching resources towards building the platform) [1], [3], [5], [29], [30], [31], [12], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38] Theoretical (models, frameworks and taxonomies for understanding MCC and theorizing the opportunities, challenges, and benefits of using the technology) [6], [39], [8], [40], [41] , [42] Within these broad categories the papers were read to identify concepts that could be considered drivers or challenges in using MCC technologies for teaching and learning. The following main categories emerged: (A) ubiquity of technology that support MCC as a teaching and learning environment; (B) data management in terms of context awareness and the identification of potential resources; (C) privacy, security and trust; and (D) risk management and assessment.…”