2021
DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2021.3065712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secure Degrees-of-Freedom of the MIMO X Channel With Delayed CSIT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under symmetric antenna configurations, the advantages of the derived results over existing results in two-user MIMO interference networks with delayed feedback [14][15][16][17] are shown in Figure 2. In particular, Figure 2 shows that if 2N ≤ R, the derived sum-SDoF lower bound is higher than the sum-SDoF of MIMO XCCM with output feedback and delayed CSIT in [17] for M < N, the sum-SDoF of MIMO ICCM with local output feedback in [16] for M < 2N, the sum-SDoF lower bound of MIMO XCCM with delayed CSIT in [15] and the sum-SDoF lower bound of MIMO ICCM with delayed CSIT in [14] for all antenna configurations. The gain of our lower bound comes from the full-duplex relay taking over the artificial noise and interference transmission from the two transmitters.…”
Section: Remark 2 (Advantages Over Existing Results In Two-user Mimo Interference Network With Delayed Feedback [14-17])mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Under symmetric antenna configurations, the advantages of the derived results over existing results in two-user MIMO interference networks with delayed feedback [14][15][16][17] are shown in Figure 2. In particular, Figure 2 shows that if 2N ≤ R, the derived sum-SDoF lower bound is higher than the sum-SDoF of MIMO XCCM with output feedback and delayed CSIT in [17] for M < N, the sum-SDoF of MIMO ICCM with local output feedback in [16] for M < 2N, the sum-SDoF lower bound of MIMO XCCM with delayed CSIT in [15] and the sum-SDoF lower bound of MIMO ICCM with delayed CSIT in [14] for all antenna configurations. The gain of our lower bound comes from the full-duplex relay taking over the artificial noise and interference transmission from the two transmitters.…”
Section: Remark 2 (Advantages Over Existing Results In Two-user Mimo Interference Network With Delayed Feedback [14-17])mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our results show that if the full-duplex relay has double antennas of the receiver, the proposed sum-SDoF lower bound is not less than the sum-SDoF in existing twouser interference networks with delayed feedback in [14][15][16][17], and can be higher than the sum-SDoF of MIMO X channel with output feedback and delayed CSIT in [17]. Moreover, the proposed sum-SDoF lower bound matches with the sum-SDoF upper bound for partial antenna configurations, characterizing the sum-SDoF for these antenna configurations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations