“…Finally, based on the previous evaluation, the binary watermark must be embedded into R according to its mean value µR; in this context, the watermark's '0s' are embedded into the pixels of the embedding region in the range of (0, µR-1), f:W = 0→(0, µR-1), and the '1s' in the range of (µR, 255), f:W = 1→(µR, 255), where f corresponds to the general embedding strategy. According to the proposed strategy, an embedding error (EE) measurement is obtained; it considers all the pixels in the ranges (0, µR-1) and (µR, 255) where the '0s' and '1s' of the watermark were embedded, respectively, as given by (15). With the aim to reduce the drawbacks of Figure 5a,b, the proposed watermark complement strategy is based on the evaluation of the pixels within the embedding region with respect to its mean value.…”