2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Securing land and property rights in sub-Saharan Africa: The role of local institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
231
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
231
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reported that although the incidence of titling is higher in East and Southern Africa, titling does not necessarily provide sufficient tenure security in these regions (Toulmin 2008). In addition, the critiques point to the dangers of such programs in aggravating socioeconomic inequalities.…”
Section: The Land Formalization Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that although the incidence of titling is higher in East and Southern Africa, titling does not necessarily provide sufficient tenure security in these regions (Toulmin 2008). In addition, the critiques point to the dangers of such programs in aggravating socioeconomic inequalities.…”
Section: The Land Formalization Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these traditional systems are now in transition to more formal systems in which common property becomes state property managed by government authorities, private property owned by individuals, or-less commonly-common property officially possessed and managed by a defined community of users through a formal legal agreement (Galvin 2009;Lane 1998;Toulmin 2009). 25 In still other cases the state may have formal control over an area but lack the capacity to manage it effectively; much of the Sahel is "state property" in a formal sense, but the state has little influence over resource rights or use (Turner, personal observation).…”
Section: Pivotal Issues and Conceptual Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thereby test the hypothesis that good institutions are likely to facilitate coordination and cooperation reducing social conflicts among households in a community (Bellows and Miguel 2009;Toulmin 2009) and consequently promote private investments, thereby increasing household adaptive capacity. If in contrast, good institutions reduce the incentive for investments due to free riding for example, the coefficients will be negative.…”
Section: Association Between Ac Adoption and Local Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%