2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Securitization and lending standards: Evidence from the European wholesale loan market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The euro‐denominated collateralized loan obligations (CLO) market, is a good laboratory to assess the impact of securitization on credit quality on an alternative institutional setting as there are significant differences between the US and European securitization markets. Firstly, the growth of European securitization has been relatively recent and swift (Kara, Marques‐Ibanez, & Ongena, ). It started timidly in the late 1990s and developed significantly only from 2004 to 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The euro‐denominated collateralized loan obligations (CLO) market, is a good laboratory to assess the impact of securitization on credit quality on an alternative institutional setting as there are significant differences between the US and European securitization markets. Firstly, the growth of European securitization has been relatively recent and swift (Kara, Marques‐Ibanez, & Ongena, ). It started timidly in the late 1990s and developed significantly only from 2004 to 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we measure bank risk using the stock market tail risk of the originators. Various papers (e.g., Kara et al, 2016;Casu et al, 2013;Michalak and Uhde, 2012;Loutskina, 2011) use accounting information (as NPL, Z-score, etc): although these measures are available for both listed and non-listed banks, these measures are backward looking. A second group of papers (e.g., Iglesias-Casal et al, 2016;Battaglia et al, 2014, Nijiskens andWagner, 2011;Battaglia and Gallo, 2013;Gorton and Metrick, 2012;Berger et al, 2015) use stock market returns to capture market risk (both in terms of systematic and systemic risks).…”
Section: [Insert Figure One About Here] [Insert Figure Two About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most securitization papers have focused on the U.S. (e.g., Casu et al, 2013;Loutskina and Strahan, 2009;Loutskina, 2011;Miam and Sufi, 2009;Chava and Purnanandam, 2011;Dell'Ariccia et al, 2012;Gorton and Metrick, 2012;Jiangli and Pritsker, 2008;Keys et al, 2010;Le et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2010;Trapp and Weiß, 2016); and there is only a handful of papers analyzing the link between securitization and risk in Europe (e.g., Kara et al, 2016;Michalak and Uhde, 2012;Farruggio and Uhde, 2015;Hansel and Krahnen, 2007;Franke and Krahnen, 2006).…”
Section: [Insert Figure One About Here] [Insert Figure Two About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, unlike the US, where the Government Sponsored Enterprises (such as the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae) are dominant market players, there is limited government involvement in the European market, which is purely driven by private institutions. Secondly, even though the US securitization market has been active since the late 1960s, the development of the European market has been relatively recent and has been attributed to the introduction of the Euro in the late 1990s (Altunbas et al 2009;Kara et al 2016). Against this backdrop, investors may have been exposed to higher information asymmetries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%