Security Digital Evidence

Richter, J.; Kuntze, Nicolai; Rudolph, Carsten

doi:10.1109/sadfe.2010.31

Cited by 23 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Legally each country has its provisions regarding the type, character, and procedure of digital evidence to be accepted at the trial of law [2]. However, in general, digital evidence can be accepted in court if it fulfills some characteristics, namely, admissible, authentic, complete, reliable, and believable [5]. Through these criteria it can be maintained the integrity of the digital evidence that will be used, the clear linkages with the case being investigated, the completeness of the evidence collected also can be trusted.…”

Section: Digital Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Storage Area Network Architecture to support the Flexibility of Digital Evidence Storage

Ali¹,

Prayudi²,

Sugiantoro³

2019

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cybercrime is a criminal activity that utilizes computers and the internet as a media in committing its crimes. In solving the case of cybercrime, it is useful with the help of digital forensics. The critical component in digital forensics is electronic evidence that has a physical form and digital evidence that has form in the binary file. Both types of evidence require handling in the storage process with different treatments. In this case, physical evidence of physical nature will be stored in the evidence room while digital evidence will be stored in evidence storage. The solution that has existed so far is through the mechanism of storing digital evidence stored in evidence storage based on internal storage with limited accessibility to one device. It causes inflexibility and effectiveness to support collaborative efforts between officers and law enforcement in the process of investigating and handling digital evidence. This research is to develop previous research on digital evidence storage and handling systems. This paper presents a solution for centralized and networkbased digital evidence storage architecture to address the weaknesses of previously available solutions. Flexibility repositories based on SAN (Storage Area Network) and webbased technology are used as network-based centralized storage architectures. The system is expected to help between law enforcement in terms of chain of custody management for digital evidence.

show abstract

Section: Digital Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Storage Area Network Architecture to support the Flexibility of Digital Evidence Storage

Ali¹,

Prayudi²,

Sugiantoro³

2019

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Meanwhile, for the infrastructure of chain of custody, [11], [45], [46] have offered a solution for the secure infrastructure for digital evidence handling, that is, by establishing the concept of valid evidence based on a hardware-based security using a TPM (trusted platform module).…”

Section: Infrastructure Securitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Chain of Custody: State of The Art

Prayudi¹,

Sn²

2015

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital forensics starts to show its role and contribution in the society as a solution in disclosure of cybercrime. The essential in digital forensics is chain of custody, which is an attempt to preserve the integrity of digital evidence as well as a procedure for performing documentation chronologically toward evidence. The characteristics of digital evidence have caused the handling chain of custody is becoming more complicated and complex. A number of researchers have contributed to provide solutions for the digital chain custody through a different point of views. This paper gives an overview of the extent to which the problem and challenges are faced in the digital chain of custody issue as well as the scope of researches that can be done to contribute in the issue of the digital chain of custody. General TermsDigital Forensics

show abstract

“…All evidence must meet certain legal requirements before being presented in court. Braid as cited in [22] has defined five rules of evidence in order for evidence to be considered useful. Evidence must be admissible, authentic, complete, reliable and believable.…”

Section: Digital Forensics Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%