2012
DOI: 10.1093/afraf/ads060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Security votes in Nigeria: Disguising stealing from the public purse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Transparency International (TI) in (Ewepu, 2019) security vote is a camouflaged cash that propels financial crime in Nigeria and over N241.2 billion is spent annually on security votes by the government. In assertion, Egbo, Nwakoby, Onwumere, and Uche (2012) affirm that security vote is unaccountable, a misappropriation and stealing of public fund under the cover of improving security network. Another factor that stimulates financial crime in Rivers State local government councils is the multiple streams of revenue from disbursement by FAAC, IGR (taxes, rates, rent, interest, fees and fines), grants and donations from oil companies, national and international development partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Transparency International (TI) in (Ewepu, 2019) security vote is a camouflaged cash that propels financial crime in Nigeria and over N241.2 billion is spent annually on security votes by the government. In assertion, Egbo, Nwakoby, Onwumere, and Uche (2012) affirm that security vote is unaccountable, a misappropriation and stealing of public fund under the cover of improving security network. Another factor that stimulates financial crime in Rivers State local government councils is the multiple streams of revenue from disbursement by FAAC, IGR (taxes, rates, rent, interest, fees and fines), grants and donations from oil companies, national and international development partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The practice continued from the 1970s to 1999. On assumption of office in 1999, President Olusegun Obasanjo continued the practice of issuing security votes, this time to state governors and local government chairmen (Egbo et al 2012). In 2017, Transparency International and Civil Society Legislative Centre (CISLAC) stated that:…”
Section: Security Votes and Their Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The pathology in the funding of counterterrorism has made "terrorist violence" and its sustenance as a channel to amass wealth. 24 As Egbo et al (2012) assert, a security vote is a major avenue of corruption and misappropriation of public funds by political officeholders. Specifically, Egbo et al (2012) argue that under the guise of national security imperatives, security votes have become institutionalized and a site of security misgovernance at federal, state, and local levels.…”
Section: Security Votes and Their Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although not every Nigerian is corrupt, it is notable that currently, "keeping an average Nigerian from being corrupt is like keeping a goat from eating cassava" [11]. In contemporary Nigeria, many acts of lawlessness such as kidnapping, daylight armed robbery, vandalism, etc., are ubiquitous, but these crimes are all linked to the fact that corruption has become institutionalised [12,13]. As Aluko [14] argues, when a society institutionalises corruption, it permeates into the value system, becomes normative and an embodiment of culture, and in turn manifest in people's behaviours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%