2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-010-9412-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedation Confounds Outcome Prediction in Cardiac Arrest Survivors Treated with Hypothermia

Abstract: Background Therapeutic hypothermia is commonly used in comatose survivors’ post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). It is unknown whether outcome predictors perform accurately after hypothermia treatment. Methods Post-CPR comatose survivors were prospectively enrolled. Six outcome predictors [pupillary and corneal reflexes, motor response to pain, and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) >72 h; status myoclonus, and serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels <72 h] were systematically recorded. Poor outco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
220
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
220
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to TTM, the “gold standard” for early prediction of neurologic outcomes was the 2006 American Academy of Neurology practice parameter, comprising 6 physical examination and diagnostic test findings on post‐arrest days 1 to 3, each with reported positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for poor neurologic outcome 10. However, validity in the TTM population has been repeatedly questioned because of decreased individual and composite PPV 11, 12, 13. The current consensus recommendation is to delay prognosis ≥72 hours post‐arrest,14 consistent with a recent study reporting average time to awakening 3.2 days post‐arrest 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to TTM, the “gold standard” for early prediction of neurologic outcomes was the 2006 American Academy of Neurology practice parameter, comprising 6 physical examination and diagnostic test findings on post‐arrest days 1 to 3, each with reported positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for poor neurologic outcome 10. However, validity in the TTM population has been repeatedly questioned because of decreased individual and composite PPV 11, 12, 13. The current consensus recommendation is to delay prognosis ≥72 hours post‐arrest,14 consistent with a recent study reporting average time to awakening 3.2 days post‐arrest 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians may recognize abnormalities on imaging and restrict treatments, fostering a link between those findings and poor clinical outcome. 5,6 One prognostic factor on imaging that has received recent attention is the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The optic nerve sheath is an extension of the dura and contains cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the optic nerve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different source of uncertainty in this study was that the clinical assessment of PHM might have been challenging due to the dynamic and intermittent character of PHM and the use of video recordings leading to an observation that is less vivid 13, 14, 16. To circumvent this issue, three instead of one experienced neurologist interpreted the clinical videos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the challenges for the use of PHM as prognosticator is that the clinical distinction between focal and generalized PHM is complicated; the assessment is hampered by the dynamic and intermittent character of PHM, hypothermia and medication effects 13, 14, 15, 16. In contrast to the current American guideline for postanoxic coma, the presence of PHM is not included as a criterion for poor prognosis in the European guideline 17.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%