2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedentary Behavior and Incident Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Abstract: BackgroundSedentary behavior is ubiquitous in modern adults' daily lives and it has been suggested to be associated with incident cancer. However, the results have been inconsistent. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to clarify the association between sedentary behavior and incident cancer.MethodPubMed and Embase databases were searched up to March 2014. All prospective cohort studies on the association between sedentary behavior and incident cancer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
77
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
77
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, because no significant relationship with mean sedentary time was observed, prolonged periods of inactivity may have a larger impact on BRCA1 rather than shorter periods of sedentary time with more frequent interruptions. These findings are in line with current literature outlining the detrimental and possibly additive effects of sedentary time, physical inactivity, and television watching on chronic disease (8,(37)(38)(39). Nonetheless, given the multiple comparisons and relatively small sample size, these findings should be interpreted with caution and require replication in a larger study population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, because no significant relationship with mean sedentary time was observed, prolonged periods of inactivity may have a larger impact on BRCA1 rather than shorter periods of sedentary time with more frequent interruptions. These findings are in line with current literature outlining the detrimental and possibly additive effects of sedentary time, physical inactivity, and television watching on chronic disease (8,(37)(38)(39). Nonetheless, given the multiple comparisons and relatively small sample size, these findings should be interpreted with caution and require replication in a larger study population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Prolonged sedentary behavior has been associated with increased cancer incidence and mortality, independent of physical activity levels, making this an important public health concern (8,37,46). Although the deleterious effects of increased sedentary time on cancer risk may be due to reduced physical activity along with the resultant metabolic and hormonal consequences (47), our data suggest that alterations in gene expression may also be involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The BC risk is 17% higher in sedentary women compared with women that perform physical activity (6). In addition, the risk of BC decreases by 5% for every 2 h per week in women performing moderate or vigorous recreational activity (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new pooled RR estimate was 1.25 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.33), and the corresponding PAF for this association was 11.6% (95% CI 10.3% to 12.9%). Shen et al 31 investigated the risk of cancer associated with higher sedentary behaviour. They reported adjusted RRs for lung cancer (1.27, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.52), colon cancer (1.30, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.49) and endometrial cancer (1.28, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.53).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%