2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment accretion and carbon storage in constructed wetlands receiving water treated with metal-based coagulants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Site reuse as a wetland (Exhibit ) fares slightly better, with 100% of the site footprint being required at a contaminant respiration rate of approximately 3 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 . Constructed wetlands are generally considered to be net sinks for carbon storage (Barbera, Borin, Cirelli, Toscano, & Maucieri, ; Rosli et al., ; Stumpner et al., ). However, at brownfield sites with poorly developed soils and other characteristics advantageous for nitrous oxide generation, much of the offset can potentially be lost if nitrate inputs to the wetlands are elevated (Palta, Ehrenfeld, & Groffman, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site reuse as a wetland (Exhibit ) fares slightly better, with 100% of the site footprint being required at a contaminant respiration rate of approximately 3 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 . Constructed wetlands are generally considered to be net sinks for carbon storage (Barbera, Borin, Cirelli, Toscano, & Maucieri, ; Rosli et al., ; Stumpner et al., ). However, at brownfield sites with poorly developed soils and other characteristics advantageous for nitrous oxide generation, much of the offset can potentially be lost if nitrate inputs to the wetlands are elevated (Palta, Ehrenfeld, & Groffman, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CETWs demonstrated greater sediment and carbon accretion than control wetlands (Stumpner et al 2018). Al CETWs had the highest vertical accretion rates (~6 cm yr -1 ) that were distributed consistently throughout the entire wetland.…”
Section: Subsidence Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In addition to the aforementioned monitoring program, Liang et al (2019) assessed vegetation in the wetlands to determine treatment effects, and Stumpner et al (2018) sampled soils and detritus at the beginning and end of the field study at locations near the inflow, center, and outflow in all wetlands that represented a downstream gradient. Stumpner et al (2018) also used soil and detritus data to assess the effects of coagulation on wetland accretion rates.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In CETWs, water quality improvement is addressed primarily by coagulation and transfer of material from the water column to the sediment, and subsidence mitigation is addressed by keeping soils saturated, which minimizes oxidation of existing organic material in addition to accumulation of new material in the wetlands in the form of plant biomass and floc (Miller et al 2008;Deverel and Leighton 2010). The subsidence component of this project is discussed in a related publication (Stumpner et al 2018); here the authors focus on water quality improvement from coagulation and wetland interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%