2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1770.2011.00459.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment‐bound nutrient export from five small reservoir catchments and its implications for the Sudan savanna zone of Ghana

Abstract: A study was carried out in the Sudan savanna zone in the Upper East Region of Ghana to assess the rate of sediment-bound nutrient export (NE) into five small reservoirs (Dua, Doba, Zebilla, Kumpalgogo and Bugri) and to analyse the implications of this export. The catchment soils and reservoir sediments from the various study sites were sampled and analysed for their bulk density, particle size distribution and nutrient content. Assessment of the nutrient concentrations indicated that the reservoir sediments we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, the suspended sediments as well as the reservoir sediments showed significantly higher contents of MOC compared to the other sediment deposits, while the MOC contents in soils was similar to that in reservoir sediments and slightly higher than in suspended sediments. This was also found by Amegashie et al (2011) and can be probably attributed partially to new, in situ formation of OC in the reservoir (Einsele et al, 2001). We suggest that at these larger scales the decrease of OC in sediments compared to soils is due to a combination of factors related to the spatial scale of observation, namely (i) variety of sediment sources, that dilute the source effect; (ii) interaction of multiple erosion processes, both selective and unselective; (iii) long transport distances that favour continuous remobilisation of sediment facilitating aggregate breakdown and a reduced physical protection of OC; and (iv) the ample time lapse (from hours to several years) that occurred between sediment detachment and its sampling.…”
Section: Oc Redistribution: Effect Of the Scale Of Observationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In our case, the suspended sediments as well as the reservoir sediments showed significantly higher contents of MOC compared to the other sediment deposits, while the MOC contents in soils was similar to that in reservoir sediments and slightly higher than in suspended sediments. This was also found by Amegashie et al (2011) and can be probably attributed partially to new, in situ formation of OC in the reservoir (Einsele et al, 2001). We suggest that at these larger scales the decrease of OC in sediments compared to soils is due to a combination of factors related to the spatial scale of observation, namely (i) variety of sediment sources, that dilute the source effect; (ii) interaction of multiple erosion processes, both selective and unselective; (iii) long transport distances that favour continuous remobilisation of sediment facilitating aggregate breakdown and a reduced physical protection of OC; and (iv) the ample time lapse (from hours to several years) that occurred between sediment detachment and its sampling.…”
Section: Oc Redistribution: Effect Of the Scale Of Observationsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The high TOC L fluxes from forested areas can be explained by their preferential location on steep slopes of high MAP areas (Table ). The decrease of TOC L with soil clay content (Figure c) is consistent with results from several studies [e.g., Boix‐Fayos et al ., ; Amegashie et al ., ] and suggests greater protection of SOC as soil clay content increases. However, other factors, such as declining slope gradient and annual precipitation (Table ), may also help explain the trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The classic methods of soil management for erosion control have been successfully studied with good impacts on crop production and soil improvement (Bonsu and Quansah., 1992;Quansah et al, 2000;Amegashie et al, 2011;Chaghazardi, Jahansouz, Ahmadi, & Gorji, 2016;Wang et al, 2017) but with less attention given to effects of crop intensification on soil and water conservation (Govers, Merckx, Van Wesemael, & Van Oost, 2016). For farming systems, most of the methods of water and soil conservation have been developed based on the three principles of mulching, minimum tillage and crop rotation (Lal, 2001;Vanlauwe et al, 2013;Kurothe et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%