2000
DOI: 10.1039/b002760j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment composition and normalisation procedures: an example from a QUASH project sediment exercise

Abstract: The QUASH UE-Project was designed to assess the reliability of normalisation approaches to compensate the influence of natural process affecting the distribution and concentration of contaminants in sediment. The focus of this paper was to test the influence on normalisation procedures of an inorganic matrix using a sample collected in the Venice Lagoon, Italy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sediments were dated by lead-210, as reported in Fabbri et al (2001a) and Matteucci et al (2001). All samples were digested with a strong acid mixture (HNO 3 , HF and H 2 O 2 ) in teflon bombs in a microwave oven following Guerzoni et al (1987), modified to optimise the dissolution of organic compounds (Miserocchi et al, 2000). After digestion, Cd and Pb were determined by graphite furnace AAS, Cu and Zn by ICP-AES, and Hg by automatic mercury analyser (US-EPA, 1998).…”
Section: Sampling and Analytical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sediments were dated by lead-210, as reported in Fabbri et al (2001a) and Matteucci et al (2001). All samples were digested with a strong acid mixture (HNO 3 , HF and H 2 O 2 ) in teflon bombs in a microwave oven following Guerzoni et al (1987), modified to optimise the dissolution of organic compounds (Miserocchi et al, 2000). After digestion, Cd and Pb were determined by graphite furnace AAS, Cu and Zn by ICP-AES, and Hg by automatic mercury analyser (US-EPA, 1998).…”
Section: Sampling and Analytical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of pollution by titanium dioxide and bauxite processing factories, or in the case of significant amounts of Al-bearing silicates in the reach of the monitoring area (e.g., feldspars), Al or Fe cannot be used as co-factors, but seems to be a promising alternative proxy for the coarse fraction. [26][27][28] Some more exotic non-anthropogenic elements like Sc, Cs, Rb and Y might then be used instead, but have been applied only in rare cases. [29][30][31] Note also that care should be taken to apply geochemical cofactor normalization in retrospective trend monitoring based on sediment profiles where there is a hint to, but a lack of a full understanding of, post-depositional early-diagenetic processes, which can create important natural enrichments at certain sediment depths.…”
Section: Geochemical Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 An alternative approach to evaluate the quality of a normalizer (a grain-size fraction, compositional co-factor or a linear combination thereof) was exemplified by the second round of the QUASH international laboratory performance assessment project. 13 The new approach, as also recently demonstrated with sediments from Venice Lagoon, 28 is to fractionate samples into subsamples of different grain-size distributions by wet sieving. Both the fine and coarser subsamples (e.g., w63 mm, v63 mm, 20-63 mm, and v20 mm) are then analyzed for the contaminants and co-factors in addition to the whole sample.…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Normalization 41 Geochemical Criteria ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pivot values are regionally dependent. For example, in the Venice lagoon in northern Italy, Al revealed similar concentrations in coarse and fine fractions due to the presence of feldspars in the coarse fraction (Miserocchi et al, 2000). Al values in sediments from Canadian waters are much higher than in sediments of Dutch marine waters (Smedes et al, 1997).…”
Section: Normalization Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%