2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-4343(00)00069-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment export from the Sepik River, Papua New Guinea: evidence for a divergent sediment plume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
95
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
95
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They are in fact quite common at the mouths of most contemporaneous rivers (Mulder and Syvitski, 1995;Kineke et al, 2000;Johnson et al, 2001;Mulder et al, 2001Mulder et al, , 2003 and pass downslope into normal turbidity currents at depths of a few tens of meters (Lamb and Mohrig, 2009), which would concur with our interpretation of most of the Navidad sandstones as shallow water sediments deposited in the vicinity of river mouths and possibly deltas. The shallow water molluscs recorded within them could therefore be attributed to their in situ occurrence, without having to explain the contradiction of their association with leaf accumulations.…”
Section: Sedimentary Environment Of the Navidad Formationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They are in fact quite common at the mouths of most contemporaneous rivers (Mulder and Syvitski, 1995;Kineke et al, 2000;Johnson et al, 2001;Mulder et al, 2001Mulder et al, , 2003 and pass downslope into normal turbidity currents at depths of a few tens of meters (Lamb and Mohrig, 2009), which would concur with our interpretation of most of the Navidad sandstones as shallow water sediments deposited in the vicinity of river mouths and possibly deltas. The shallow water molluscs recorded within them could therefore be attributed to their in situ occurrence, without having to explain the contradiction of their association with leaf accumulations.…”
Section: Sedimentary Environment Of the Navidad Formationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This has led to the prevailing dogma that continental shelf sediments are hemipelagic in nature, i.e., composed of a mixture of fine biogenic particles derived from marine production (5-75% by volume) and terrigenous silt (Shanmugam et al, 1985;Stow et al, 1985). However, it is becoming increasingly recognized that some LDEs (e.g., Sepik, Ganges-Brahmaputra, Eel, and Rhone) are characterized by direct export of large volumes of sediment and OM to the lower continental margin due to: (1) a narrow (active continental margin) shelf (Kineke et al, 2000;Mullenbach and Nittrouer, 2006); (2) progradation of the deltaic clinoform in the late Holocene near to the shelf edge (Coleman et al, 1998); (3) density-driven, cold shelf water (winter) advection (Puig and Palanques, 1998); or (4) landward incision of the associated submarine canyon so that it intercepts along-shelf transport pathways (Johnson et al, 2001;Michels et al, 2003). The Mississippi River margin possesses two of these characteristics (2 and 4), making it a candidate for large-scale OM export.…”
Section: Sediment and Om Transport From Large Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that voluminous amounts of sediment can be transported from the shelf through present-day canyons in areas where the sediment source is near the canyon head (i.e., a river discharging onto a narrow shelf) (e.g., Kineke et al, 2000). The GOL data support these results showing active sediment escape through a submarine canyon that is adjacent to a narrow shelf.…”
Section: Impact/applicationsmentioning
confidence: 74%