2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-3227(03)00089-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment properties, flow characteristics, and depositional environment of submarine mudflows, Bear Island Fan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) resembles that of trough- mouth fans described from the Norwegian and Antarctic margins (e.g., Laberg and Vorren 1995;Passchier et al 2003). This poorly sorted diamicton resembles deposits termed glacigenic debris flows from the Norwegian margin (Bowles et al 2003;Dahlgren and Vorren 2003) and eastern Canadian margin (Tripsanas et al 2005) that are interpreted to result from direct flow of glacial till down the continental slope (Nygård et al 2005). 7b), the base of which penetrated the mass-transport deposit and recovered a carbonate-rich diamicton.…”
Section: Character and Age Of Glacigenic Debris Flows On The Continenmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4) resembles that of trough- mouth fans described from the Norwegian and Antarctic margins (e.g., Laberg and Vorren 1995;Passchier et al 2003). This poorly sorted diamicton resembles deposits termed glacigenic debris flows from the Norwegian margin (Bowles et al 2003;Dahlgren and Vorren 2003) and eastern Canadian margin (Tripsanas et al 2005) that are interpreted to result from direct flow of glacial till down the continental slope (Nygård et al 2005). 7b), the base of which penetrated the mass-transport deposit and recovered a carbonate-rich diamicton.…”
Section: Character and Age Of Glacigenic Debris Flows On The Continenmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…9). Rheological analysis of submarine debrite samples, which are progressively diluted, suggests that such low yield strengths may indeed characterize debris mixtures with densities up to 1500 kg −3 or ≈ 40% volume sediment (Bowles et al ., 2003). Alternative explanations for such long run‐out include hydroplaning (Mohrig et al ., 1998) and elevated pore‐fluid pressure at the base of the debris flow (Gee et al ., 1999).…”
Section: Debris Flow Rheology and Extreme Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the results show, in our model solutions θ never exceeds 0.68 while the flow is turbulent so that this is not a significant issue. An expression for the yield strength,  y , for turbulent flow, even up to very high solid fractions, can be derived from a curve fitted to the empirical data of Huang and Garcia (1998), Parsons et al (2001) and Bowles et al (2003) for fine-grained sediments (Fig. 3); we find: σ y = 0 .1341exp 10 .14 ϕ (30).…”
Section: Yield Strength and Viscosity Of Flowmentioning
confidence: 98%