2020
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment suspension and bed morphology in a mean shear free turbulent boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify the wall boundary, the data were divided into segments. There is negligible change in the inner boundary within 50 s (Johnson & Cowen 2020); thus the data were divided into several 50 s (200 image pairs) intervals for subsequent processing. The brightness at the wall boundary is always strong.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the wall boundary, the data were divided into segments. There is negligible change in the inner boundary within 50 s (Johnson & Cowen 2020); thus the data were divided into several 50 s (200 image pairs) intervals for subsequent processing. The brightness at the wall boundary is always strong.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that an oscillating plate in the water above a fluid-saturated particle bed induces pressure gradients that provoke particle motion and a formation of a heap. This is an example of failure in absence of mean shearing [2], in which the formation of a heap is associated with creeping that causes small rearrangements of the particles, likely driven by a gradient in pressure rather than shear stresses [3][4][5]. Here, we extend the experimental activity by employing plates with different dimensions and flexibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The inability of the models to resolve the sub-grid turbulence, may result in only a subset of resuspension events being simulated, and those resulting from mean shear-free boundary turbulence (Johnson and Cowen, 2020) being neglected (e.g., HFIW events). Thus, we applied Eq.…”
Section: Turbulence-based Parameterizations In Rans Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 𝜏 defined by existing threshold models is most often determined by flume experiments using mean current velocity profiles (Shields, 1936;Soulsby et al, 1997). However, on larger scales and in more complex systems (e.g., shallow marine environments and large lakes), the threshold could be reduced because of the enhanced intensity of intermittent turbulent events (Salim et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2016), including resuspension from mean shear-free turbulence (Johnson and Cowen, 2020). Therefore, parameterizing 𝜏 from time-averaged current speeds is not always appropriate for modelling the bottom nephyloid layers in the presence of trubulent bursting events (Bourgault et al, 2014;Aghsaee and Boegman, 2015), including the turbid hypolimnion beneath HFIWs in this study.…”
Section: Parameterization Based On Near-bed Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%