2001
DOI: 10.2307/1352875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment Transport and Trapping in the Hudson River Estuary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
140
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
140
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work by Geyer et al (2001), Woodruff et al (2001), and Traykovski et al (2004) discuss watershed inputs to the Hudson estuary turbidity maximum (ETM) in the context of what enters the estuary at the Federal Dam. These studies offer a simplified view of sediment transport through the freshwater reach necessitated by the lack of observational data in this reach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Geyer et al (2001), Woodruff et al (2001), and Traykovski et al (2004) discuss watershed inputs to the Hudson estuary turbidity maximum (ETM) in the context of what enters the estuary at the Federal Dam. These studies offer a simplified view of sediment transport through the freshwater reach necessitated by the lack of observational data in this reach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the advective flux, u′ [a]c′ is the dispersive flux, and u′a′[c] is Stokes drift flux; these three terms typically dominate in estuarine systems (Geyer et al 2001;Ganju et al 2005). However, because of low tide range and the infrequency of storms in southern California salt marshes, it is likely that these components are negligible most of the time.…”
Section: Sediment Flux Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Hudson River Estuary (see Fig. 1 of Geyer et al (2001) ). Depth variations in both lateral and longitudinal directions will result in much more complicated residual flow phenomena (Monismith et al 2002;Valle-Levinson et al 2003).…”
Section: Model Assumptions and Their Connection To Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Hudson River Estuary, Geyer et al (2001) observed that, in a cross-section in the upper reach, turbidity maxima occurred on both left and right sides, whereas in a crosssection near the mouth, only one turbidity maximum was only found on the left side (when looking into the estuary). Recent data collected in the North Passage of the Yangtze Estuary, China, also show different turbidity maxima at two separate cross-sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%