2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3663380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedimentation of a charged colloidal sphere in a charged cavity

Abstract: An analytical study is presented for the quasisteady sedimentation of a charged spherical particle located at the center of a charged spherical cavity. The overlap of the electric double layers is allowed, and the polarization (relaxation) effect in the double layers is considered. The electrokinetic equations that govern the ionic concentration distributions, electric potential profile, and fluid flow field in the electrolyte solution are linearized assuming that the system is only slightly distorted from equ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H 1 and H 2 depend on λ a impressively, but H 3 is not a sensitive function of λ a . These coefficients for an impermeable sphere having a surface charge density of σ p = Qa /3 (the same total fixed charge as a porous sphere of equal radius) in a concentric spherical cavity as a function of a / b are also drawn by dashed curves in Figures a, a, and a for comparison. It can be seen that the values of H 1 and H 2 for the impermeable sphere are comparable with those for the porous sphere with λ a = 10, but the value of H 3 is greater for the impermeable sphere than that for the porous sphere with even a very low value of λ a (because the sedimentation-induced electric field around an uncharged particle impermeable to the electrolyte ions in the charged cavity is greater than that around a permeable one).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…H 1 and H 2 depend on λ a impressively, but H 3 is not a sensitive function of λ a . These coefficients for an impermeable sphere having a surface charge density of σ p = Qa /3 (the same total fixed charge as a porous sphere of equal radius) in a concentric spherical cavity as a function of a / b are also drawn by dashed curves in Figures a, a, and a for comparison. It can be seen that the values of H 1 and H 2 for the impermeable sphere are comparable with those for the porous sphere with λ a = 10, but the value of H 3 is greater for the impermeable sphere than that for the porous sphere with even a very low value of λ a (because the sedimentation-induced electric field around an uncharged particle impermeable to the electrolyte ions in the charged cavity is greater than that around a permeable one).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was extended to a numerical calculation for the case of an arbitrary zeta potential . Recently, the sedimentation of a dielectric sphere in a concentric charged spherical cavity was analyzed with the surface charge densities of the particle and cavity wall as small perturbation parameters …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The particle surface and cavity wall are allowed to bear electric charges and the conducting fluid may be an electrolyte solution, but the electric double layersadjacent to the particle and cavity surfaces are assumed to be thin relative to the particle radius and the gap width between the solid surfaces ( ) b a − such that the entire fluid phase is electrically neutral with a uniformity in the ionic composition. Electrokinetic (electrophoretic and/or electro-osmotic) and gravitational effects, which have been considered separately [30]- [32] and can be added directly due to the linearity of the problem, are ignored here. The objective is to determine the boundary effect of the enclosing cavity on the EMP velocity of the particle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Ohshima et al obtained both analytical formulas and numerical results of the sedimentation velocity and potential for the case of a broad range of zeta potential and double-layer thickness. On the other hand, Booth’s perturbation analysis has also been extended to determine the sedimentation velocity and potential in suspensions of interacting hard spheres, porous (permeable) spheres, and soft (composite) spheres with low fixed charge densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%