1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-5457.1984.tb00173.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedimentological and Paleontological Analysis of Jurassic North Sea Deposits From Deltaic Environments

Abstract: Core samples from Well 33/9‐3, Norwegian North Sea, have been analysed sedimentologically, palynologically and micro‐paleontologically. The cores cover the Toarcian Drake Member of the Dunlin Formation, and nearly the whole thickness of the Middle Jurassic Brent Formation. The Drake Member is characterized by pro‐deltaic depositional conditions. In the Brent Formation, five members are recognized (from below): the Broom, Rannoch and Etive Members represent distributary mouth bar facies; while the Ness and Tarb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unit has been divided into five formations (Deegan & Scull, 1977), with the Broom Formation at the base, overlain successively by the Rannoch, Etive, Ness and Tarbert Formations. The Broom Formation is of problematical origin, being described variously as a mass-flow deposit (Parry, Whitley & Simpson, 1981), a transgressive sand (Gray & Barnes, 1981), a storm deposit (Chauvin & Valachi, 1980), a distributary mouth bar sand (Nagy, Dypvik & Bjaerke, 1984), a fluvial sand (Kirk, 1980) or, more broadly, an offshore sand sheet (Budding & Inglin, 1981). It consists of two facies, a coarse-grained arkosic sand No, of ions on the basis of 24 0 6.…”
Section: The Brent Sandstonesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The unit has been divided into five formations (Deegan & Scull, 1977), with the Broom Formation at the base, overlain successively by the Rannoch, Etive, Ness and Tarbert Formations. The Broom Formation is of problematical origin, being described variously as a mass-flow deposit (Parry, Whitley & Simpson, 1981), a transgressive sand (Gray & Barnes, 1981), a storm deposit (Chauvin & Valachi, 1980), a distributary mouth bar sand (Nagy, Dypvik & Bjaerke, 1984), a fluvial sand (Kirk, 1980) or, more broadly, an offshore sand sheet (Budding & Inglin, 1981). It consists of two facies, a coarse-grained arkosic sand No, of ions on the basis of 24 0 6.…”
Section: The Brent Sandstonesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, the dominance of Ammobaculites, Bulbobaculites, Kutsevella and Haplophragmoides, as well as the low diversity (cf. Nagy et al 1984Nagy et al , 1990Nagy 1992) suggest that the uppermost Pliensbachian -Toarcian sediments at Anholt record progressive shallowing of the environment. The presence of a few ammonite fragments and some dinoflagellate cysts show that marine influence persisted.…”
Section: Palaeoenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%