2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2004.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sedimentology of rocky shorelines: 3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that local morphological variations (e.g. surface irregularities, bed roughness, macro-roughness or microtopography) influence entrainment and transport distance during storms and tsunamis (Noormets et al, 2004;Hansom et al, 2008;Imamura et al, 2008;Nandasena et al, 2013;Terry et al, 2013;Weiss and Diplas, 2015). The scale of these roughness parameters is typically weakly described by the authors, although Nandasena et al (2013) use a Manning's formula of 0.025 and suggest that macro-roughness may have obstructed boulder movement.…”
Section: Geomorphological Control On Boulder Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has been suggested that local morphological variations (e.g. surface irregularities, bed roughness, macro-roughness or microtopography) influence entrainment and transport distance during storms and tsunamis (Noormets et al, 2004;Hansom et al, 2008;Imamura et al, 2008;Nandasena et al, 2013;Terry et al, 2013;Weiss and Diplas, 2015). The scale of these roughness parameters is typically weakly described by the authors, although Nandasena et al (2013) use a Manning's formula of 0.025 and suggest that macro-roughness may have obstructed boulder movement.…”
Section: Geomorphological Control On Boulder Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is mounting (but still limited) evidence for storm induced boulder movement in a range of geomorphological settings . Recent research has documented stormdriven, bi-monthly to century timescale changes in coastal boulder deposits in subtidal (Mastronuzzi and Sanso, 2004), intertidal (Chen et al, 2011;Knight and Burningham, 2011;Peréz-Alberti and Trenhaile, 2015), supratidal (Noormets et al, 2004;Goto et al, 2013) and cliff-top (Hansom et al, 2008;Fichaut and Suanez, 2011) settings. These typically report movement of boulders months to years before and after a storm and reflect poor time-coupling between field observations and actual storm events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although cliff‐top boulder research has been mainly conducted based on field surveys, the hydraulic force necessary to transport boulder onto a cliff‐top can be examined with theoretical or numerical modelling, and by conducting laboratory experiments (e.g., Noormets et al, ; Hansom et al, ; Kogure and Matsuoka, ; Rovere et al, ; Herterich et al, ). For the calculation of cliff‐top deposition from either the cliff edge or the cliff base, the vertical boulder transport motion must be solved because the vertical acceleration (leading to vertical wave force) becomes significant in these locations (Noormets et al, ). Although some formulations which can solve boulder motion have been proposed (e.g., Noji et al, ; Nott, , ; Imamura et al, ; Nandasena et al, ; Nandasena and Tanaka, ), none of these models have considered the vertical motion of water rushing up the cliff face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rahiman, et al, 2007) or intertidal platform (e.g. Jones and Hunter, 1992;Young et al, 1996;Nott, 1997;Noormets et al, 2004;Scheffers, 2004;Scicchitano et al, 2007). Notched cliffs can also collapse due by waves, distinct from gravity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%