2019
DOI: 10.31223/osf.io/fwsnp
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SediNet: A configurable deep learning model for mixed qualitative and quantitative optical granulometry

Abstract: I describe a configurable machine-learning framework to estimate a suite of continuous and categorical sedimentological properties from photographic imagery of sediment, and to exemplify how machine learning can be a powerful and flexible tool for automated quantitative and qualitative measurements from remotely sensed imagery. The model is tested on a large dataset consisting of 400 images and associated detailed label data. The data are from a much wider sedimentological spectrum than previous optical granul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current model estimates average beach d50 to within 20% at five out of the seven sites. This error range is similar to the results of the wide sedimentological spectrum of well and poorly sorted sediment tested in Buscombe (2020).…”
Section: Grain Size Analysis Techniquessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The current model estimates average beach d50 to within 20% at five out of the seven sites. This error range is similar to the results of the wide sedimentological spectrum of well and poorly sorted sediment tested in Buscombe (2020).…”
Section: Grain Size Analysis Techniquessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Acquisition of such large datasets at scales comparable to high resolution RPAS surveys will require the use of terrestrial or airborne laser scanning. We anticipate that a more advanced ML approach, of which we are already seeing more widespread application within geomorphological fields (e.g., [75]), in combination with a significantly larger training dataset, will facilitate the development of a much improved AI model for predicting spatially variable elevation error for any given topographic dataset derived from the RPAS-SfM workflow.…”
Section: Spatially Variable Error For Geomorphic Change Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%