2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed biology of Australian arid zone species: Germination of 18 species used for rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since restoration of disturbed arid or semi-arid environments is often hindered by low seedling establishment, information on seed biology and germination is a valuable tool for restoration practices (Commander et al 2009). Soil seed bank germination was significantly and interactively affected by N and water supply, although the response observed for each species or functional group (woody, forbs and grasses) varied dramatically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since restoration of disturbed arid or semi-arid environments is often hindered by low seedling establishment, information on seed biology and germination is a valuable tool for restoration practices (Commander et al 2009). Soil seed bank germination was significantly and interactively affected by N and water supply, although the response observed for each species or functional group (woody, forbs and grasses) varied dramatically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthocercis littorea (Solanaceae) germination has a strong requirement for karrikin treatment. However, high concentrations of GA 3 (2.89 mM) can promote its germination, as can KAR 1 (0.67 μM) (18). GA 3 and KAR 1 both induced germination of three Asteraceae species (A. tomentosus, P. canescens, and Myriocephalus guerinae) and enhanced dark germination at a range of temperatures (77).…”
Section: Light and Hormone Interactions With Smoke-stimulated Germinamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, large effects on other responsive species have been reported before (Plummer and Bell 1995;Purbey and Meghwal 2005). Unfortunately, responses can be very species-specific (Commander et al 2009) even within the ); pre-soaking duration (10, 24, 34 or 48 h); substrate GA3 concentration (0, 250 or 500 mg g -1 ); control (no pre-soak, no GA3 in substrate). Standard error of the plotted means ranged from 0.32% to 0.88% for the pre-soak GA3 concentration means, from 0.46% to 1.25% for the pre-soak time means and from 0.4% to 1.08% for the means of the substrate chemicals used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%