2018
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed‐dispersal interactions in fragmented landscapes – a metanetwork approach

Abstract: Mutualistic interactions repeatedly preserved across fragmented landscapes can scale-up to form a spatial metanetwork describing the distribution of interactions across patches. We explored the structure of a bird seed-dispersal (BSD) metanetwork in 16 Neotropical forest fragments to test whether a distinct subset of BSD-interactions may mediate landscape functional connectivity. The metanetwork is interaction-rich, modular and poorly connected, showing high beta-diversity and turnover of species and interacti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
177
4
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(230 reference statements)
12
177
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be explained by the dominant role of small birds (e.g., tyrant flycatchers and mockingbirds, see Carlo & Morales, ) in dispersing seeds. Thus, our findings might be explained in part by trait matching between small‐bodied birds and small‐seeded fruits that are common in fragmented tropical landscapes (Emer et al, ). In fact, other studies have reported how the general positive relationship between seed mass and seedling emergence can sometimes be offset by higher dispersal rates of small‐seeded species (Moles & Westoby, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be explained by the dominant role of small birds (e.g., tyrant flycatchers and mockingbirds, see Carlo & Morales, ) in dispersing seeds. Thus, our findings might be explained in part by trait matching between small‐bodied birds and small‐seeded fruits that are common in fragmented tropical landscapes (Emer et al, ). In fact, other studies have reported how the general positive relationship between seed mass and seedling emergence can sometimes be offset by higher dispersal rates of small‐seeded species (Moles & Westoby, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, plant species that produce fruits for long time periods may have greater opportunities for interacting with frugivores and be thus dispersed more frequently than species with shorter fruiting periods (González‐Castro et al, ). Seed mass also influences the number of seeds that are ingested and dispersed by frugivores and the seed per capita establishment rates, with more seeds being dispersed from the small‐seeded species (Emer et al, ), while large‐seeded species experience higher per capita establishment (Foster & Janson, ). Thus, plant community structure is influenced in part by how plant species traits affect frugivory, seed dispersal and emergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considered under the network paradigm, extinctions can lead to extinction cascades (Emer et al 2018), decreases in community stability (Spiesman and Inouye 2013) and even network collapse (Jiang et al 2018). Although the importance of accounting for secondary extinctions is firmly recognized (Brodie et al 2009, Colwell et al 2012, the contribution of cascading effects to the payment of extinction debts remains the least explored component of extinction debts.…”
Section: ) the Disjunctive Loss Of Interacting Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these direct effects, habitat fragmentation can also influence biodiversity patterns through indirect effects. For example, loss of large‐bodied seed dispersers in fragmented forests has been shown to reduce the efficiency of seed dispersal (Cramer, Mesquita, & Williamson, ; Emer et al , ), which in turn has significant influences on plant communities (Liu et al , ). However, we found no specific studies on this topic in China, and this represents an important knowledge gap that deserves further research.…”
Section: Impacts Of Forest Fragmentation On Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%