2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed Dispersers, Seed Predators, and Browsers Act Synergistically as Biotic Filters in a Mosaic Landscape

Abstract: In this study, we analize the functional influence of animals on the plants they interact with in a mediterranean mountain. We hypothesise that seed dispersers, seed predators, and browsers can act as biotic filters for plant communities. We analyse the combined effects of mutualistic (seed dispersal) and antagonistic (seed predation, herbivory) animal interactions in a mosaic landscape of Mediterranean mountains, basing our results on observational and experimental field. Most of the dispersed seeds came from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we took into account the transition between plant regeneration stages, seen as the result of filtering agents (e.g. frugivores, seed predators, abiotic factors causing seedling mortality; Zamora and Matías ) operating on successive demographic processes (fruit removal and seed dispersal, seedling establishment; Wang and Smith ). We assumed that these filters may modify the global distribution of interaction frequencies between plant and bird species from the stage of seed dispersal to that of seedling recruitment, and thus that these distribution changes are well represented by network metrics related to interaction diversity (Schleuning et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we took into account the transition between plant regeneration stages, seen as the result of filtering agents (e.g. frugivores, seed predators, abiotic factors causing seedling mortality; Zamora and Matías ) operating on successive demographic processes (fruit removal and seed dispersal, seedling establishment; Wang and Smith ). We assumed that these filters may modify the global distribution of interaction frequencies between plant and bird species from the stage of seed dispersal to that of seedling recruitment, and thus that these distribution changes are well represented by network metrics related to interaction diversity (Schleuning et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, for adult plants, we estimated the overall surface area (m 2 ) that they covered under focal trees. On the other hand, for saplings, we counted the number of individuals and sorted them into two categories: (1) young saplings (immature individuals of 2–14 years) and (2) old saplings (pre‐reproductive individuals >14 years), the age of which were estimated by counting growth scars (in species where this was possible) or using plant size as a proxy (see Zamora & Matías, ). All plants were identified to the species level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest succession depends on the presence and composition of advance regeneration in a forest stand, which in turn depends on biotic and abiotic filters along the pathway from seed to seedling [ 23 , 69 ]. We synthesized field data into SOEL, a flexible individual-based model of the early oak life cycle ( Fig 1 ) to quantify how key filters including seed predation, seed dispersal, and drought interact with silvicultural disturbance to influence the regeneration of oak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%