1954
DOI: 10.1038/1741151b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed Dressings for the Control of Wheat Bulb Fly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GLC values of insecticide retention indicated that neither of these insecticides exhibited any substantial systemic action, thus confirming the results obtained by . This contrasts with the organochlorine seed dressing dieldrin, which was thought to cause a high rate of larval mortality within the shoot due to systemic action (Gough and Woods, 1954).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GLC values of insecticide retention indicated that neither of these insecticides exhibited any substantial systemic action, thus confirming the results obtained by . This contrasts with the organochlorine seed dressing dieldrin, which was thought to cause a high rate of larval mortality within the shoot due to systemic action (Gough and Woods, 1954).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is concluded from the present work that control of adult wheat bulb fly populations by means of insecticidal seed dressings on wheat crops in the previous year is unlikely to be a practical method with the new organophosphorus insecticides. Little is known of the effectiveness of organochlorine insecticides as a means of decreasing the number of pupae formed, but Gough and Woods (1954) suggested that dieldrin caused a high rate of larval mortality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dieldrin and y-BHC seed-dressings have been used for more than 10 years to control wheat bulb fly. Results of many trials have shown that y-BHC acts mainly by preventing larvae entering the plants and kills few larvae that succeed in entering, whereas dieldrin acts mainly by killing larvae after they enter (Gough & Woods, 1954;Bardner, 1958;Way, 1959;Maskell & Gair, 1961 ;Gough, Woods, Maskell & Towler, 1961). Both materials are less effective in organic soils than in mineral soils (Gough et al, 1961.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However dieldrin and most dosages of carbophenothion failed to decrease the percentage damaged shoots significantly at Semer and at Rothamsted. This result with dieldrin is to be expected because dieldrin is only partly effective in preventing larvae entering the plants, acting mainly by killing larvae after they have entered (Gough and Woods, 1954). Carbophenothion, however, acts principally by preventing larvae entering the plants and its failure to do so at Semer and Rothamsted was disappointing.…”
Section: Short-row Trials 1972-73mentioning
confidence: 98%