1992
DOI: 10.4141/cjps92-031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed yields of canola and volunteer barley as influenced by their relative times of emergence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Postharvest application alone was agronomically equivalent to the best POST application in 2002, but not 2003, for which seed yield was lower, possibly because of interference from weeds emerging in the spring of that year. The finding of abundant canola production after PREPLANT glyphosate application is in agreement with a number of studies reporting that early weed removal is important to maximize canola yield (Clayton et al 2002;de St. Remy and O'Sullivan 1986;Martin et al 2001;O'Donovan 1992). in conventional canola was reflected in the greenhouse dose-response assay.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Postharvest application alone was agronomically equivalent to the best POST application in 2002, but not 2003, for which seed yield was lower, possibly because of interference from weeds emerging in the spring of that year. The finding of abundant canola production after PREPLANT glyphosate application is in agreement with a number of studies reporting that early weed removal is important to maximize canola yield (Clayton et al 2002;de St. Remy and O'Sullivan 1986;Martin et al 2001;O'Donovan 1992). in conventional canola was reflected in the greenhouse dose-response assay.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In all instances, there was a linear increase in canola yield as glyphosate was applied at earlier leaf stages of the crop (Table 4). This supports the conclusion that earlyemerging weeds cause the greatest reductions in crop yield (O'Donovan 1992;O'Donovan et al 1985;Peters 1984). Martin et al (2001) showed that weeds can remain in canola up to the four-leaf stage without a yield loss greater than 5%, because of the plasticity of canola in recovering yield potential once the weeds were removed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, the impact of the weed on crop yield loss varied among years, and no attempt was made to incorporate a relative time of emergence parameter into the equations. This factor can be at least as important as weed density when assessing crop yield loss due to wild oats (Cousens et al 1987) and volunteer barley (O'Donovan 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%