2011
DOI: 10.1603/ec10388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeds of Change: Corn Seed Mixtures for Resistance Management and Integrated Pest Management

Abstract: The use of mixtures of transgenic insecticidal seed and nontransgenic seed to provide an in-field refuge for susceptible insects in insect-resistance-management (IRM) plans has been considered for at least two decades. However, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has only recently authorized the practice. This commentary explores issues that regulators, industry, and other stakeholders should consider as the use of biotechnology increases and seed mixtures are implemented as a major tactic for IRM. We dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
132
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
132
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be related to the commercialization of rootworm-targeting transgenic corn expressing various insecticidal proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). Growers tend to plant rootworm Bt corn even in rotated fields, either to protect against rotation resistant populations, or because elite high-yielding non-Bt hybrids are difficult to obtain [17]. This practice reduces the selective advantage to rotation resistant phenotypes in rotated fields, because mortality is as high as among susceptible phenotypes ovipositing in non-rotated Bt corn [18 ].…”
Section: Spread Of Resistance Among Existing Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be related to the commercialization of rootworm-targeting transgenic corn expressing various insecticidal proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). Growers tend to plant rootworm Bt corn even in rotated fields, either to protect against rotation resistant populations, or because elite high-yielding non-Bt hybrids are difficult to obtain [17]. This practice reduces the selective advantage to rotation resistant phenotypes in rotated fields, because mortality is as high as among susceptible phenotypes ovipositing in non-rotated Bt corn [18 ].…”
Section: Spread Of Resistance Among Existing Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larval dispersal between Bt and non-Bt plants can result in a sublethal dose, promoting differential survival of heterozygotes over homozygous susceptible larvae, thus accelerating accumulation of resistance alleles in the population. Models generally affirm that larval dispersal leads to faster evolution of resistance in a blended than in a block refuge system [17,50], unless substantial (but, unfortunately, realistic) grower noncompliance is included for the latter [51 ]. Recent research indicates that larval movement in several lepidopteran pest species is a threat to the blended refuge strategy [52][53][54].…”
Section: Spread Of Resistance During Species Invasion or Range Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seed mixtures have several advantages relative to block refuges, particularly convenience for farmers and elimination of noncompliance with block refuge requirements (15,17). However, seed mixtures increase opportunities for larval movement between Bt and non-Bt plants or plant tissues, which could accelerate resistance evolution by raising the dominance of resistance or by reducing the survival of susceptible insects (13)(14)(15)17). Despite potentially profound implications of the seed mixture strategy for the sustainability of Bt crops, large-scale field tests of its efficacy have been lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new refuge delivery concept for Bt cotton and is currently undergoing experimentation and appears to be a promising field-viable option. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%