2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing light and shadows: A commentary on the 2017 European Society for Vascular Surgery carotid guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The document itself is ponderous, running some 80 pages and inclusive of nearly 500 references; indeed, I found it a wonderful reference document. The Special Communication article of Paraskevas et al 2 published in this issue of the Journal of Vascular Surgery is a useful guide to discern differences in the current ESVS guideline that might be compared, for example, with the widely quoted American Heart Association and Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. Even somewhat amusing is the resurrection of the carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative (typically considered in some quarters to mean equivalent) to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) language; at least in symptomatic patients, the 2017 ESVS guideline strongly endorses CEA (vs CAS) as the preferred intervention in the majority of patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The document itself is ponderous, running some 80 pages and inclusive of nearly 500 references; indeed, I found it a wonderful reference document. The Special Communication article of Paraskevas et al 2 published in this issue of the Journal of Vascular Surgery is a useful guide to discern differences in the current ESVS guideline that might be compared, for example, with the widely quoted American Heart Association and Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. Even somewhat amusing is the resurrection of the carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative (typically considered in some quarters to mean equivalent) to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) language; at least in symptomatic patients, the 2017 ESVS guideline strongly endorses CEA (vs CAS) as the preferred intervention in the majority of patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%