Seeing Like an Oil Company: Space, Security, and Global Capital in Neoliberal Africa

Abstract

In this article, I seek to identify a limitation in the analysis James Scott offers in Seeing Like a State (1998) by asking to what extent his account of the follies of schemes for planned improvement by states provides critical leverage on the present world of neoliberal global capitalism. Scott has claimed that a dynamic of standardization, homogenization, and grid making applies not only to developmentalist states but also equally to the contemporary world of downsized states and unconstrained global corporations. I contest that claim by tracing how recent capital investment in Africa has been territorialized, and some of the new forms of order and disorder that have accompanied that selectively territorialized investment. Because such investment has been overwhelmingly in mineral resource extraction—particularly in oil—a contrast will become visible between the homogenizing, standardizing state optic Scott analyzed and a rather different way of seeing, proper to the contemporary global oil company.

A Particular Place? Laos and its Incorporation into the Development Mainstream

“…I also wish to use the country as a stage on which to rehearse, and reflect on, discussions of "trans-national governmentalities" and "village governmentalities". The first of these is exemplified in the work of Ferguson (2005) and Ferguson and Gupta (2002) and, in writing of trans-national governmentalities, they are referring to "…not only new strategies of discipline and regulation, exemplified by the WTO and the structural adjustment programs implemented by the IMF, but also transnational alliances forged by activists and grassroots organizations and the proliferation of voluntary organizations supported by complex networks of international and transnational funding and personnel" (Ferguson and Gupta, 2002, page 990). The notion of village governmentalities, meanwhile, picks up on discussions over village transnationalism and highlights the way in which people -individuals and households -often separated across space, are deeply 8 connected.…”

Remaking Africa’s Informal Economies: Youth, Entrepreneurship and the Promise of Inclusion at the Bottom of the Pyramid

“…These benefits and the transformational narratives that accompany them are not easily dismissed in a continent where many experience less an adverse incorporation in the global economy than an exclusion from it (Ferguson, 2005). But though entrepreneurs may emerge, if even tenuously, from the 'shadows' of the slum into recognition as 'legitimate' market actors, their inclusion into BoP circuits of capital hinges on an ex ante conversion, as transforming the self is a prerequisite to the realm of hope and possibility the BoP project evokes.…”

Large-Scale Mines and Local‑Level Politics

“…They therefore have the effect of creating what Ferguson (2005) calls an 'ungovernable space', and in the Melanesian political landscape few spaces are less governable than those which surround a large-scale mining project (Allen 2013). The regimentation of life within a mining compound therefore stands in stark contrast with the unruliness that prevails on the other side of the fence (Golub 2014).…”