Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to review spirituality at work literature and to explore how spirituality improves employees' performances and organizational effectiveness. The paper reviews about 140 papers on workplace spirituality to review their findings on how spirituality supports organizational performance. Three different perspectives are introduced on how spirituality benefits employees and supports organizational performance based on the extant literature: a) Spirituality enhances employee well-being and quality of life; b) Spirituality provides employees a sense of purpose and meaning at work; c) Spirituality provides employees a sense of interconnectedness and community. The paper introduces potential benefits and caveats of bringing spirituality into the workplace; providing recommendations and suggestions for practitioners to incorporate spirituality positively in organizations.Key words: Spirituality at work, performance, organizations, human resources, well-being, benefits, caveats, reviewPaper type: Literature review 3
A new paradigm in organizations: Spirituality movementThe purpose of this paper is to review spirituality at work literature and to explore how spirituality improves employees' performances and organizational effectiveness. The paper reviews about 140 papers on workplace spirituality to review their findings on how spirituality supports organizational performance. Three different perspectives are introduced on how spirituality benefits employees and supports organizational performance based on the extant literature. The paper also introduces four potential caveats of bringing spirituality into the workplace; and provides recommendations for practitioners to incorporate spirituality positively in organizations.A number of scholars mention a paradigm shift in organizational sciences, management theory and practice in the past two decades (Capra, 1996;Giacalone and Dafna, 2000;Harman and Hormann, 1990;Ray and Rinzler, 1993;Wheatley, 1992). It seems this paradigm shift is complex and includes multiple dimensions such as moving from a predictable outlook to chaos (Gleick, 1987), from command and control or fear-based approaches to trust and empowerment (Conger and Kanungo, 1988), from simplicity to complexity (Lewin, 1992), from transactional leadership to transformational leadership (House and Shamir, 1993), and from closed systems to complex adaptive systems (Dooley, 1997). These changes in management include a shift from an economic focus to a balance of profits, quality of life, spirituality, and social responsibility concerns (Walsh, Weber, and Margolis, 2003;DeFoore and Renesch, 1995), a shift from self-centeredness to interconnectedness (Capra, 1993), a shift from self-interest to service and stewardship (Block, 1993;Neck and Milliman, 1994), and a change from materialistic to a spiritual 4 orientation (Fox, 1994; Neal, 1997, DeFoore andRenesch, 1995).In line with this paradigm shift, we have witnessed that organizations and managers have been discovering and experimenting...