2014
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Research on Plant Science Teaching and Learning

Abstract: In this editorial we link the articles published in this Special Focus section with the practical utility of using plants in education to transform and transcend traditional botany classes. We suggest current and future implications of research in this area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the argument put forward by Sanders (2019), that the apparent "slowness" of plants could be one reason for not noticing them, might also be a factor. This mirrors much of the research work in educational science that concerns questions of preference for animals or plants (e.g., Wandersee, 1986;Kinchin, 1999); student responses to diverse plant education interventions (e.g., Lindemann-Mathies, 2005;Fančovičová, & Prokop, 2011;Nyberg & Sanders, 2014;Krosnick, Baker, & Moore, 2018;Pany et al, 2019); student reactions to specific plant displays in botanic gardens (e.g., Tunnicliffe, 2001;Sanders, 2007); considerations of plants in science curricula content (e.g., Hershey, 2002;Galbraith, 2003;Ebert-May & Holt, 2014); and the relatively few visual cognition studies concerned with plants (e.g., Schussler and Olzak, 2008;Balas & Momsen, 2014). Furthermore, a large body of educational research has concerned itself with the identification of plants and the perceived connections between knowledge of, and attitudes to, plants (e.g., Bebbington, 2005;Frisch, Unwin, & Saunders, 2010).…”
Section: Introduction and Backg Roundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the argument put forward by Sanders (2019), that the apparent "slowness" of plants could be one reason for not noticing them, might also be a factor. This mirrors much of the research work in educational science that concerns questions of preference for animals or plants (e.g., Wandersee, 1986;Kinchin, 1999); student responses to diverse plant education interventions (e.g., Lindemann-Mathies, 2005;Fančovičová, & Prokop, 2011;Nyberg & Sanders, 2014;Krosnick, Baker, & Moore, 2018;Pany et al, 2019); student reactions to specific plant displays in botanic gardens (e.g., Tunnicliffe, 2001;Sanders, 2007); considerations of plants in science curricula content (e.g., Hershey, 2002;Galbraith, 2003;Ebert-May & Holt, 2014); and the relatively few visual cognition studies concerned with plants (e.g., Schussler and Olzak, 2008;Balas & Momsen, 2014). Furthermore, a large body of educational research has concerned itself with the identification of plants and the perceived connections between knowledge of, and attitudes to, plants (e.g., Bebbington, 2005;Frisch, Unwin, & Saunders, 2010).…”
Section: Introduction and Backg Roundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are exciting research challenges for bright undergraduate minds, but perhaps not always as immediately attractive as research on artificial intelligence or cancer. Encouraging more students to embrace plant science is thus urgent, but not always easy (Leversley et al, 2012 ; Australian Council for International Agricultural Research, 2014 ; Ebert-May and Holt, 2014 ; Jones, 2014 ). How might those of us teaching future scientists provide them with the intellectual impetus to pursue plant science?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 These activities may lead to the development of knowledge and skills that promote inquiry in more complex topics, such as the community structure and may also allow the development of a closer bond between the learner and nature. 34,35 Whether the activities described in the CAPS documents are indeed sufficient to allow learners to develop knowledge, skills and a positive view of plants remains to be investigated in the South African context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%