2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811894106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeing who we hear and hearing who we see

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative complexity of this process explains why individual recognition has long been thought to be a uniquely human capacity, which has been reported to develop ∼4 mo of age (35). However, it has recently been demonstrated in a few other species (16)(17)(18)(19) and might be more widespread in animals (36,37). Evidence for individual recognition by rhesus macaques raises the issue of the adaptive value of this very precise type of social recognition during interactions with conspecifics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The relative complexity of this process explains why individual recognition has long been thought to be a uniquely human capacity, which has been reported to develop ∼4 mo of age (35). However, it has recently been demonstrated in a few other species (16)(17)(18)(19) and might be more widespread in animals (36,37). Evidence for individual recognition by rhesus macaques raises the issue of the adaptive value of this very precise type of social recognition during interactions with conspecifics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cross-modal sensory perception is the ability to integrate information from multiple senses-in the case of individual recognition, this often involves matching vocal and visual cues, which may be demonstrated through experiments in which subjects detect a mismatch when the cues do not correspond [5,7]. While there is now direct evidence for cross-modal recognition in a range of species tested in captive or domestic settings [5,[7][8][9], this ability has not been directly shown in the wild during natural social communication among conspecifics [6]. Such investigations are facilitated by a study species where repeated social interactions lead to important long-term social relationships, in which communication involves multiple sensory modalities, and where communication signals are known to provide familiarity cues as well as potential cues to identity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while individual recognition is thought to be a widespread ability [3], providing robust scientific support for recognition at the level of the individual has proved difficult [4,5]. 'True' individual recognition strictly constitutes the identification of a specific individual, according to individually distinct cues, and the placement of that individual within a society of many others [6]. In empirical terms, it is necessary to demonstrate (i) that recognition occurs at the level of the individual (rather than at a broader level) and (ii) that there is matching of current sensory cues to identity with information stored in memory about that specific individual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to truly demonstrate individual recognition, it is necessary to show that a test subject identifies a specific individual and that there is a match between current individually distinct cues, such as the individual's vocalization, and information about that individual that is stored in the memory of the test subject, such as the individual's last known location [117].…”
Section: Cross Modal Individual Recognition In Carnivoresmentioning
confidence: 99%