2004
DOI: 10.1378/chest.125.6.2300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeking a Home for a PET, Part 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes greater than 1 cm is high, although the accuracy and specificity rates are low ( 19 ). In a study by Detterbeck et al ( 20 ), the false positive rate of PET in mediastinal lymph nodes was reported to be 13-22%, and the false negative rate as 5-8%. In our study, histopathologic lymph node evaluation was carried out in 21 of the 50 patients, and 52% of the 21 patients were correctly staged by 18 F-FDG PET/CT whereas the rate of patients incorrectly down-staged or up-staged by 18 F-FDG PET/CT were detected as 19% and 28%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sensitivity of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes greater than 1 cm is high, although the accuracy and specificity rates are low ( 19 ). In a study by Detterbeck et al ( 20 ), the false positive rate of PET in mediastinal lymph nodes was reported to be 13-22%, and the false negative rate as 5-8%. In our study, histopathologic lymph node evaluation was carried out in 21 of the 50 patients, and 52% of the 21 patients were correctly staged by 18 F-FDG PET/CT whereas the rate of patients incorrectly down-staged or up-staged by 18 F-FDG PET/CT were detected as 19% and 28%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, preoperative assessment of lymph node status is strategical to assess the proper treatment; N2 status may require neoadjuvant therapy or exclude surgery, while N1 status should guide the decision of upfront surgical resection, to be performed either with as VATS or open surgery. However, preoperative staging is still affected by high rates of false-positives or negatives due to the relatively low sensitivity and specificity of Chest Computed Tomography (CT) and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18-FDG-PET), and to the reduced use of preoperative invasive staging procedures such as mediastinoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) [42][43][44]. Cerfolio et al [45] reported that, when analyzing all clinical stage patients, 14% of them had unsuspected pN2 metastases.…”
Section: Unexpected N2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a full discussion of this debate is beyond the scope of this review, we believe that use of PET is reasonable in selected high-risk patients, including patients with primary tumors that are large, centrally-located or adenocarcinoma by histology, as well as patients with hilar nodal enlargement [26, 27]. However, because these are situations in which the likelihood of malignant mediastinal lymph node involvement is actually increased, many would argue that tissue sampling is mandatory in these patients, and that PET is therefore superfluous except for the potential to more specifically direct mediastinal biopsies or evaluate for distant metastasis.…”
Section: Initial Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%